Donate SIGN UP

Hard To Have Sympathy With This Couple

Avatar Image
Redhelen72 | 12:21 Mon 29th Jan 2024 | News
25 Answers

They appear to think that everyone is out to get them - they could have quit whilst ahead but continued.

all this money over a lamp!

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13011341/Pensioners-100000-bill-neighbours-lantern-kent-hunt-pollard.html

Gravatar

Answers

21 to 25 of 25rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Redhelen72. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.

ymb, it doesn't matter if the light is bounced off the moon and back; the point is that they've forced light pollution on their neighbours, and that's unneighbourly.

jno - // ymb, it doesn't matter if the light is bounced off the moon and back; the point is that they've forced light pollution on their neighbours, and that's unneighbourly. //

That may be, but as several series of a Channel 5 documentary series have proved, neighbours are not always neigbourly.

In a situation like this, you have to take an objective look at the situation, and analyse, without getting het up about your 'rights', exactly what chance you have of winning a court case.

I would suggest an ethical solicitor would have advised them that a win was unlikely.

That means, either that their solicitor was unethical, unlikely, joking aside, or that they chose to proceed, motivated by an over-developed and irrational sense of victimhood and home/castle egotism.

They appear to have chased their quarry over a cliff, and spent an obscene amount of money simply to try and score a phyrric victory, which they have failed to do.

They may have been morally right, but in the real world, a moral victory does not automatically convert into a legal one.

As they have discovered, to their considerable cost.

The light bounces off a church but how reflective is brickwork?

 

My inlaws had a lamp identical to the one in this case, there was no complaints from neighbours either side of their property. 

The couple brought a vexatious case because of previous acrimony, and lost.

They then followed a private prosecution and lost again.

Doing the same thing and expecting a different result is the well-known known definition of insanity. 

They lost. And now they want to make it anyone's fault but theirs.

I know you can't judge people fro their picture, but looking at these two, it's hard not to do so.

JNO, "ymb, it doesn't matter if the light is bounced off the moon and back"

Do you not think the neighbours would have objected to a power station being built to power such a light?

21 to 25 of 25rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Do you know the answer?

Hard To Have Sympathy With This Couple

Answer Question >>

Related Questions