Donate SIGN UP
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 38 of 38rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
IMO one of the reasons she did this is because she hates Westminster and loves to thwart it at every attempt! Well it backfired on her this time and well done Rishi for standing firm. Good man.
or maybe she knew what Westminster goverment would do and taht it would give her the ammunition she wants to justify independance from UK
It almost seems like the SNP are deliberately picking a fight with Westminster so they can bolster the case for another referendum.
I wonder what the majority of SNP supporters think.
For those who might be thinking it was only SNP MSPs voting in favour of the Bill, this is how the voting went.

Scottish National Party  
54 for, 9 against

Scottish Labour  
18 for, 2 against

Scottish Liberal Democrats  
4 for, 0 against

Scottish Green Party  
7 for, 0 against

Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party  
3 for, 28 against

There was support from some members of all the parties in the Parliament.
That's right, ride rough shod over the masses, after all after the current Bill goes through they will be jailed for protesting. Well done Herr Sunak.
But are the Scottish really free if they're under the thumb of the Sassenach?
Last I heard Scotland sent 59 MPs to Westminster so hardly under anyone's thumb, as is identical to all nations in the Union. On fact it's only England that hasn't any devolved powers, so the English clearly have the best argument for being under the thumb; certainly not any of the privileged countries.
Where areas of responsibility are devolved, Secretaries of State and Ministers in the UK government are responsible for those matters affecting England.
-- answer removed --
//That's right, ride rough shod over the masses,//

But the representatives of "the masses" (i.e. the people of the United Kingdom) have decided that the idea should not be sanctioned. Leaving aside the merits of the plan, Scotland is not an autonomous nation and when its devolved government takes decisions that affect people in the rest of the UK, the Westminster government is entitled to step in. If you are going to prattle on about the masses being ridden over roughshod, it is the 92% of people not living in Scotland who are being ridden over by an administration over which they have no control.
the paper on which the government have based their section 35 order is here - it makes interesting reading
https://policyexchange.org.uk/publication/the-scottish-gender-recognition-reform-bill/#contents__accordion
the scottish government have said (their) legislation makes no change to the reserved Equality Act 2010 and that principle is enshrined in the Bill, which is at odds with the above link.

which court gets to decide this?
//...which court gets to decide this?//

If the Scottish government opt for a Judicial Review (which I think is the only realistic option open to them) it will be heard in the High Court.

Personally, I believe this should not be a judicial decision. The UK government still has authority over Scotland and actually can revoke the Scotland Act in its entirety if it had the mind to. It is a political decision taken with that in mind.
T.C.L. posted last night that all parties except the Cons. voted heavily in favour of the SNP 's law. I thought that was odd, but I heard today that the Cons. were the only party to allow a free vote on the issue.
I repeat that I consider using vulnerable youngsters as political pawns is despicable.
Not quite, I posted, "There was support from some members of all the parties in the Parliament."
Corby, I thought your figures showed the Conservatives as the only party with a majority against the proposed law. I think that’s what jourdain is saying.
Sorry TCL, I wasn't quoting what you said; I was really referring to the figures you provided, which did show heavy voting for. Apologies again for any misunderstanding by anyone.
Has anyone thought to have the woman tested for mental impairment I wonder?

She seems to set her face, and what a face it is, against anything regarded by most as 'normal', fighting battles on garbage while 'her' country goes to hell in a handcart in real and tangible ways.

Hateful, incompetent witch of a woman who'll not be missed.

21 to 38 of 38rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Do you know the answer?

Well Done Rishi.....common Sense.

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.