Donate SIGN UP

High Court Asylum Protestors

Avatar Image
fender62 | 15:31 Mon 13th Jun 2022 | News
58 Answers
watching the news and seeing the protestors outside the court, reaffirms my belief they must all be on benefits and want the illegals to stay and ermm be on benefits to, oh the irony of it.
i dont have a link, what are you thoughts.
Gravatar

Answers

41 to 58 of 58rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by fender62. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
// I thought the rules were clear. Apply for asylum in the first country of safety you reach. //

What rules are those?
You might ask yourself, how on earth did those Ugandan Indians, including Priti Patel's parents, get all the way to the UK? And could they do that in 2022?
archibaldy "What rules are those? " - EUSSR and the wider UN.
//You might ask yourself, how on earth did those Ugandan Indians, including Priti Patel's parents, get all the way to the UK? And could they do that in 2022?//
Didnt they come here on legal flights via a special Ugandan Resettlement Board and as they had British passports .... dont think any turned up in dinghys from France without ID papers
Ellipses at 7.59pm - that’s possibly one of the most absurd posts I’ve ever seen on this site.

Kudos.
The rules on which they entered in 1972 were changed in 1981.

These days, how can asylum seekers enter the UK? It is not possible to apply from outside the country, and there is no asylum visa. Therefore, to claim asylum in the UK a person must enter either irregularly, such as by small boat, lorry, or by using false documents, or for another purpose, such as tourism or study. Others could arrive without a required visa.

We have changed the rules, forcing people into these dangerous boats. Those people are a mix of genuine asylum seekers and illegal immigrants - both are lined up for export to Rwanda as if they were the same, and the protestors in the OP are trying to separate one from the other.

As I said, without the protestors, and in 2022 rather than 1972, Priti Patel's asylum seeking parents would find themselves in Rwanda. And she knows it ...

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/priti-patel-immigration-laws-parents-home-office-brexit-a9343571.html
ellipsis, if any of them are genuine cases then there case will be heard in Rwanda. We all know once there here they stay here whether illegal or legal... and most on dingys are illegals
Just 11 people on the first flight, bet that cost the tax payer a packet







Just 11 people on the first flight.





// EUSSR and the wider UN //

Which actual rules though? Doing a Google search of that statement just brings up many links saying that there are no rules to that effect.. The EU Dublin agreement does say something like that with caveats, but then we aren’t part of the EU anymore so how to they apply to us?
"but then we aren’t part of the EU anymore so how to they apply to us? " - well it would never apply anyway because we are always the rarget never an intermediate.

It's basically a geneva convention in origin:
https://fullfact.org/immigration/refugees-first-safe-country/
sorry that is claimed.
That's right it doesn't apply, so we can no longer try to return anyone to other European countries.
The Dublin convention did not state definitively that it has to be the first country but that members could decide which between them and it often could be but now mire often it can be gamily connections that are given priority.
https://ukandeu.ac.uk/the-facts/what-is-the-dublin-regulation/#:~:text=The%20Dublin%20Regulation%20(also%20known,first%20arrives%20in%20the%20EU.
"That's right it doesn't apply, so we can no longer try to return anyone to other European countries." - that does not follow, why should we take them all? Even if it's not a rule it makes no sense to travel through multiple safe countries and risk death in the channel.
Just 11 people on the first flight, bet that cost the tax payer a packet.

Gotta start somewhere. Well worth it if it deters alot of others from coming across in dinghys and stops people messing with delaying appeals that
are you a UK taxpayer then gulliver
"Just 11 people on the first flight, bet that cost the tax payer a packet. " - great that proves the process, others will follow but soon they won't bother crossing.
Ellipsis, 19.22. What danger does France pose to them that they need to flee to the UK and seek asylum here?
Can everyone stop calling them asylum seekers please? They are not, they are economic migrants, illegal immigrants.

41 to 58 of 58rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3

Do you know the answer?

High Court Asylum Protestors

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.