Not really, N. It simply doesn't do to repeat the tragedy by branding opponents of what is, in the end, a policy objective, as anti-democratic. Bearing in mind, after all, that our primary means of democracy is representative, what is wrong in asking that Parliament play an active role in debating whether or not a given model of Brexit is appropriate for the country? It is clearly acceptable. Just because you disagree on what counts as acceptable doesn't mean that only your interpretation is the true position, or the democratic one, or the one that respects the electorate.
The problem comes because many seem determined that 52% of the voters should get 100% of the spoils. A compromise is still far more desirable; and a No Deal Brexit is, by definition, the opposite of compromise. So is unilaterally deciding to revoke Article 50, I hasten to add -- but the failure of compromise is a far more serious betrayal of democracy.