Still Not Convinced?

[-Talbot-]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3651294/Michael-Jackson-underage-sex-collection-photos-naked-teenage-boys-male-erotica-depicting-men-children-detailed-newly-released-police-report-2003-search-Neverland-Ranch.html


Any defenders still sticking with the same old nonsense?


Let's hear it ... he wasn't convicted ... he's innocent ... blah , blah , blah.

[ummmm]

I was a massive MJ fan as a youngster but I was always convinced of his guilt.

[Gromit]

A book of art photographs from the early 1800s is hardly evidence of the most heinous pf crimes. The book is available on Amazon uk.

[RandyMarsh]

I dont know if he was guilty or not but why were these not used as evidence against him?

[ummmm]

Millions of dollars.

[jourdain2]

So glad I was never a fan and always thought him a bit of a weirdo - probably the upbringing and fame too early. Sad. :(

[naomi24]

//Millions of dollars. //

So why now?