True -- which establishes the electrical nature of thought -- but only with a special interface - which establishes the comparative weakness of it.
A lot of Naomi's arguments seem to be based on a variation of appeals to ignorance -- we don't know, therefore we can't rule anything out, so stop trying. It's never been fully established here what "don't know" means, precisely. In the past I've noticed that "not knowing" seems to cover any level of knowledge that isn't 100% certain. In turn this rules out all Scientific knowledge now and for all time, as technically nothing in Science is ever 100% certain. But there comes a point where the level of doubt is insignificant, and therefore the model being tested, so far as it goes, can be assumed true, at least until a better model comes along.
It also was based on a misunderstanding of the meaning of "Absence of Evidence". This applies specifically to cases where there has been no investigation of any kind, or at least no investigation that is extensive enough to be able to draw any conclusions from it. In many of the topic that have been debated, there is in fact a great deal of evidence, and most of it is negative. This, then, is not absence of evidence, but absence of "positive evidence". If such positive evidence for some theory is absent, then there is very strong evidence that the theory is incorrect.
That's an aside, and something that I hope you will read, Naomi, even though you probably will not reply to it. In the case at hand it applies in the following way: the brain has been examined extensively (though not completely, there is much more still to do) and no signs either of the electrical signals which we can identify as "thought" propagating independently of the brain (or some highly conductive wire attached to it), nor of there being anything else that can propagate that would provide a mechanism for telepathic thought. Indeed, because the electrical signals are enough to be interpreted as thoughts in cases studied so far, that is both strong evidence that thoughts are physically embodied by electrical signals, and that nothing else is necessary. Equally, experiments designed to seek such "psi phenomena" have so far found nothing. Therefore, there is a lot of negative evidence, or absence of positive evidence.
So, there is no evidence of anything else going on beyond a (complicated!) electrochemical process, and therefore no reason to expect that some other process will be discovered in the future.