Elderman -
“... Let us use an illustrate why a God of order would allow disorder on earth...”
Okay. Let's pretend. I love silly childish games. They make me feel young again.
“... Imagine, if you will, walking into a forest and coming upon a house. As you inspect the house, you see that it is in disorder. The windows are broken, the roof has serious damage, the wooden porch is full of holes, the door is hanging on one hinge, and the plumbing does not work.
In the face of all these defects, would you conclude that no intelligent designer could possibly have designed that house?...”
Indeed not. I would conclude that the house, having been designed and built, had been left to rack and ruin for reasons currently unknown. Wow! This is an intriguing and interesting story. I wonder where it will lead? Please continue!
“... But when you more thoroughly examine the structure, you see that it was originally put together well and gives evidence of much thoughtful designer . But it was now simply run down and on the way to ruin...”
Okay...
“... What could the defects and problems indicate? They could suggest that (1) the owner died; (2) he is a capable builder but is no longer interested in the house; or (3) he temporarily leased his property to unappreciative tenants...”
Yes, I understand all that. The house is in ruins and we don't know specifically why – we've already established that.
“... The latter is similar to the situation regarding this earth. But why so long of time?”
What!?! Is that it? All that exposition for such a pathetically flimsy ending?
So what you're saying is that the Earth is like the abandoned house. It has been designed by a designer but that designer has then left it to go to rack and ruin. And what do you think that says about god (the supposed designer)? It says to me that if he did create the earth then he's clearly not in the least bit interested in it any more and has long since departed leaving his 'creation' to the ravages of nature and time.
If this is an argument for an almighty, all loving god then it's a spectacularly poor one. Also, it has nothing to say about the issue about which you are purporting to be addressing – namely, “Why does God allow suffering?”.
Your capacity for obfuscation seems to know no bounds.