Donate SIGN UP

Hrh Abdication

Avatar Image
hammerman | 06:56 Mon 02nd Jan 2017 | Society & Culture
64 Answers
Do you think, when the time comes, that Charles will be king or will he pass it on to his son, William?

I don't mind Charlie but i just don't think he's in touch with the real world. Wills seems to have a level head on, a decent family man and is liked by most of the country.

Of course, we could just buckle-up, hold tight and give it to Harry. Now that would be a fun ride!!!!!
Gravatar

Answers

41 to 60 of 64rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by hammerman. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
It would be very unfair to Charles, unless his choice, given he has been prepared from birth to be king.

I also think it would benefit William and his family to have more time, especially with young children, before he becomes king. Not that they don't have the scrutiny and royal duties and such now, but I feel that being king would be significantly more restrictive than their lives at present.
I think I would dispute the fact that the queen does not have a useful job - I think that the mere fact that she is there with a right to veto any new law prevents silly new laws making it on to the statute books. Just suppose, for argument's sake, that Donald Trump decided to change the American Constitution such that he could remain president for as long as he likes ie, no more elections. His party has a majority in both houses, so it's possible. If a similar proposal went through our system the queen could refuse to give the royal assent and prevent that happening.
BHG....Betty has signed off all sorts of daft and divisive laws into being, all her working life.
Yes she has Mikey because she knows "It's the will of the people" in this democracy. Simply knowing the limit is there stops utterly stupid proposals being put forward.
doesn't really matter what you think of the present monarch, the next in line or the concept of the monarchy; it isn't going to change any time soon. at present none of the main political parties, or none of those fringe parties with even a glimmer of electoral credence, are even discussing making republicanism a manifesto pledge, never mind actively campaigning for it. there could of course be a referendum, but on what grounds? at present there are dissenting voices, but the country isn't bitterly divided and there's no populist agenda for abolition of the monarchy. even if there was a referendum, what is the likelihood of a "republic" majority - even an AB Remainer "four fifths of five eighths of F-all" type majority that gets quoted on here repeatedly?
I would be quite happy if the whole lot abdicated......for ever!
Queen Camilla......shudder
as wotsit said, not much point having an archaic system based on heredity if you are going to bypass the next in line
I think you mean hereditary bednobs.
// You've heard of the Sun King? Harry would be the Fun King! //

aaarh tis lucky he isnt pale and interesting or else we would call him
the wan .......

Charlie boy has waited too long not to sit in the throne
abd anywayafter 1936 abdication is looked on as a weak strategy
I do hope the poor old dear isn't reading all this speculation about her on the royal laptop (while sipping gin and munching swans).
"Phillip, come and have a look at this, the cheek of it ..can we behead them?"
"No dear ... not even if they're slitty-eyed I'm afraid"
// I think you mean hereditary bednobs//

heredity could fit
porphyria is still present - we all thought it was Margaret and her flighty jobbies but in fact it was the fella who drove his aeroplane into a grassy knoll on camera ! richard of gloucester I think

and haemophilia - but that on average dies out in three generations
// "No dear ... not even if they're slitty-eyed I'm afraid"//

or HM the Q ( for it is she ) do we have enough heirs Philip
Prince P - no and I have told Eddie to pull his finger out and get on with it !

( princess eddie wilts in the corner )
William of Gloucester. Richard is the current Duke.
thx jay dee !
Will the bowing and fawning still be part of .
Yes - weecalf - tugging your forelock will be compulsory.
If the Queen caught the cold that I had in October, then she will be offline for another two,weeks! Streaming eyes and nose for acces, followed by Horrible catarrh then a hacking cough that lasted 6 weeks! And I'm a lot younger than she is!
It was pouring with rain at Sandringham yesterday, so I don't blame her for staying indoors!
o who has not had her floozy jab ?

I got pleurisy in October and it scared the crap out of me (immunosuppressed)
.// // "No dear ... not even if they're slitty-eyed I'm afraid"//

well readers - I read in La Stampa that the gunman in Istanbul was of asian origin or specifically 'slitty eyed'

http://www.lastampa.it/2017/01/02/esteri/istanbul-caccia-al-killer-di-origini-cinesi-2lksZ84Zwth9sdNWJwAUxJ/pagina.html

Prince Philip if he reads this (!) might comment
o my god dear these little blighters get everywhere !

41 to 60 of 64rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Hrh Abdication

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.