That's about it isn't it TTT.
Professor Dawkins takes the time to explain evolution at a level where a competent ten year old could grasp what he is saying, and as soon as he got going, the other guy zoned out and started thinking about the Book Of Genesis.
As the professor pointed out, with admirable patience I think, the book was written by some scribe eight hundred years BC, so what makes that more believable than the concept of evolution.
If I write now, here, today, that the moon is made of green cheese, if someone finds that in a couple of thousand years time, is it true, because I said so, and history apparently gives gravitas proportional to the length of time involved?
Clearly it's not, but that is the premise under which the professor's companion is arguing.
It doesn't stand up to the simplest of scrutiny - but then that's what faith is, believing something you can't know, or prove.