Donate SIGN UP

A Prison!!!! A Better Life Than Many On The Outside!!

Avatar Image
RATTER15 | 11:01 Wed 16th Mar 2016 | News
25 Answers
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-35813470

There is humane and there is humane!
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 25rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by RATTER15. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Do you think?

Sounds good to me - this is a step in the rehabilitation process - they work and move about a place that feels real, rather than being spat straight out of a nasty hole.

At least they might be able to imagine a version of life on the other side where they don't return to crime?

Importantly, this is on an island, away from normal people. The main function of prison is to keep those who transgress the rules of our society, away from it.

This appears to continue to do this, despite being nicer.
Can I move this to News for you?
Breivik is a huge argument for capital punishment - not an ounce of remorse.
It seems a sensible approach and the recidivism stats seem to bear that out.

Whatever Anders Breivik needs/wants/thinks ought to remain unreported. He should be consigned to the dustbin of history unremarked and unmourned.

The far-right must be deprived of 'Martyrs'.
um.... so you're applying for a place are you Ratter ?'
Question Author
Hi Ed, please move it where you wish, I only put it in Chatterbank as I wasnt actually asking a question, more of a subject for discussion.

I totally agree with the idea of rehabilitation and it appears to be working but come on, that's hardly much of a punishment.

Crapatcrypics, why should he get off so lightly, there is no suffering in death, a few moments and it is all over, let him sweat it out in prison!!
Question Author
PP. "um.... so you're applying for a place are you Ratter ?"

well the reviews are quite good!
It gets good reviews on Trevago !
// let him sweat it out in prison!!//

That made me chuckle. Where does he sweat it out there. His on-suite sauna in his cell?
No, it's not much of a punishment, I don't think this part is meant to be.

It is confusing as he has a sentence which is longer than the normally legally sanctioned amount - so it doesn't really matter where he is as he's not going anywhere soon.
Shouldn't there be an element of deterrent?
"Shouldn't there be an element of deterrent? "

only if there are plans to let him out at some stage...I cant believe anybody in their right mind would ever let him out , he should die incarcerated...

Im sure theres some right on liberal lefties that will say otherwise...
"Shouldn't there be an element of deterrent?"

Prison is a deterrent, and it doesn't seem to be working very well?

As I stated above, in my opinion the main role of prison is to keep those who break the law away from the rest of us i.e. it's about exclusion from society, and protection for the law abiding within it.

Anything else prison does is secondary to that?
"Prison is a deterrent, and it doesn't seem to be working very well?"

maybe because for most the sentences arent harsh enough and the conditions arent either....

"if you cant do the time then dont do the crime"....well obviously for most they can...
Isn't the general consensus that no one thinks they'll be caught? So the time to crime ratio isn't a factor in that decision-making process?

On the other hand - maybe it's working perfectly, and we're asking too much of the prison system. After all, bad guys tend to get put away for a bit, and we're out here obeying the law. Maybe everyone out here has been deterred effectively?

I agree with the concept of keeping wrong doers away from the rest of us. Setting aside Anders Breivik and his ilk whose terms of imprisonment are very long and possibly permanent...and at this point of course...the question arises of where evil tips into madness.
Anyway...where was I? Oh yes. Should punishment be a requirement of a term in prison if it doesn’t rehabilitate? Should punishment be a requirement if it actually interferes with rehabilitation and thus make it less likely to succeed?
I don't think there's any kind of horror in the world that would have deterred Breivik in the slightest.
I was talking in general terms.
How many times do I have to say on here that it is not prison that is the punishment , it is the removal from society.
As I have also said many times, in the UK at least ( almost certainly in other places as well) 75% of ALL those who have been in prison even for a very short sentence NEVER work again, because the prejudice against employing an 'ex con' is so strong!
Once you have served even a week or two in jail you are virtually excluded from normal society for the rest of your life.
The 'deterrent' is the deprivation of liberty, the loss of the ability to earn a 'proper wage', and the separation of the prisoner from his/her family and support network.......and that is also the punishment.

Anything other than that is 'punitive' and cannot be guaranteed to make sure that a contrite and rehabilitated offender is released back into society.

Surely it has to be more cost effective both in terms of ££££s and the well-being of society to ensure that the number of recidivists is a low as possible?

1 to 20 of 25rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

A Prison!!!! A Better Life Than Many On The Outside!!

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.