Foxy Knoxy did she or didn't she ?

[smurfchops]

Why can't she settle this by taking a lie detector test. And why does Hilary Clinton have to be involved? Nothing to do with her.

[smurfchops]

But Jeremy Kyle does them all the time !!!!!

[rov1200]

Why was Foxy's DNA on the knife that killed him?

[craft1948]

killed him?

[Lonnie]

It was a Kitchen knife that she'd previously used in the kitchen.

I think there's plenty of room for doubt, but she was there, so if she isn't the killer,she would know who is.

[smurfchops]

Her eyes are too close together....

[Mr Veritas]

Polygraph (Lie Detector) Tests are not admissable in law in Italy.
I must admit she did look a trifle "touched" in the way she kept smirking/smiling during her sentencing,this was the first time I had seen her close up,but she does seem to be strange.
Hilary Clinton is just getting publicity out of it(as always).

[ABerrant]

Hilary Clinton is US Secretary of State i.e. in charge of international relations, foreign affairs, US Embassies and Diplomats etc. etc. - in other words ANYTHING that involves US interests and citizens outside of the US.

I'm pretty sure you would expect the UK Foreign Office (Milibland) to take an interest if you were in court/prison in another country.

[Meridianman]

The prosecutor who led the investigaton is awaiting sentance for abuse of power charges.... From what I understand she was practicing yoga and not doing cartwheels.

Furthermore despite demands from the defence for a video, audio or transcript of her initial interrogation (where she apparently claimed to have been in the house when the murder took place) the police have failed to provide it. At first they siad they had lost the tape, later they said there was no tape. Nor do they have a transcript.
All very fishy.

I'd take a good bet with someone that she's out in 2 years on appeal. I beleive a lot of this is about 'la faccia'. i.e. saving face for the judiciary, the police and the prosecutors

[smurfchops]

I wonder if she will make a million dollars selling her story ?

[joggerjayne]

Amanda did not kill Meredith.

There has never been one scrap of credible evidence against Amanda Knox.

Amanda ... is ... innocent.

She will win on Appeal.

[joggerjayne]

No doubt Meredith will rest in peace ...

... knowing that 2 innocent people are in prison.

Whoever butchered poor Meredith probably laughs himself to sleep every night, as the hyenas of the world dribble over innocent Amanda.

[Seadragon]

The Italian Court found Knox guilty and as they say Hiliary Clinton shouldn't question their practice, it's not a political matter. I think knox is guilty she changed her story to many times by offering alibi's and then trying to blame the club owner for the murder as well as her conduct during the trial.

[joggerjayne]

ahmskunnirt and seadragon

From what you say, you have both evidently read the headlines, but not the details of the evidence that was

(or, in reality, was not)

... adduced at Trial.

Seadragon ...

Amanda's very first statement to the Police was truthful and accurate.

She changed it later.

Why?

To incriminate a person whom the Police were determined to incriminate.

Why would she do such a thing?

She says the Police brutally forced her to do it.

Is that true?

Well, we can find out by studying the Police tapes.

Oh, no ... we can't ... because the Police have changed their story several times over the whereabouts of their own tapes, and have refused to allow them to be studied.

Funny that !!!

Or ... to use the word used in our legal system ... "currupt"

[Ankou]

oh dear jayne, are you going to keep this up for 26 years ?