Donate SIGN UP

Why Would Any Woman Do This???

Avatar Image
sp1814 | 11:10 Wed 17th Jan 2024 | News
45 Answers

Warning - pretty graphic content.

https://apple.news/ALMqxgQVBRDKrjkW5tWtcaw

Gravatar

Answers

21 to 40 of 45rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by sp1814. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Question Author

You're on the wrong thread if you want to discuss Asian groomung gangs. 

This might be the one you meant:

https://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/News/Question1860439.html

You also referred to the above link in Khando's post a couple of days ago:

https://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/News/Question1860430.html

This isn't the right thread to refer back to Asian grooming gangs. This thread is about false rape claims. 

//This thread is about false rape claims. //

 

Yes - by a gang.

Just in case you missed it, SP.  From your link.

 

//A serial fantasist's lies that she was groomed by an Asian gang ...//

Question Author

naomi24

This thread ia about a false rape claim and the impactt it can have. If you would like to turn it into a discussion on Asian grooming gangs, feel free - but the thread won't stay around for very long.

Apologies SP I think I may have mentioned race first of all.

It was in relation to someones comment about mental illness - I do not think the person is mentally ill I think it was about race - hence me mentioning and lifting those comments from your link

Question Author

Redhelen72

No worries at all! I wasn't having a dig, although looking back, it *does* look as if I was!

;-)

SP, Had you wanted to restrict the discussion solely to false claims of rape, you should have said because that woman is claiming rather more than.  Just for clarity it might be an idea to tell everyone that your link is not what you want to talk about.  I'll leave you to it.

Question Author

naomi24

 

I won't get into semantics with you.

No-one has time for that.

The video you posted clearly shows the liar being taken by police in a police car for her to identify and pinpoint the premises she claimed she was groomed and raped by Asian men. Ergo it would seem perfectly acceptable for naomi to mention this in her post as well as the other twe rapes she claimed.

Why would someone do this?  Only the person concerned really only ever knows. 

It does seem a bit extreme for race hate though.

At least the sentence sends a message to others considering these sort of basless accusations (and I dont mean the he said she said) ones.  There have been too many of these recently, texts/emails usually catch them out luckily.

 

I see the true purpose of this post. All all the victims are liars and the fluffy bunny muslim groomers are all innocent. Right oh!

SP is using one loony attention seeking phsycho it cast doubt on the rest of the muslim groomers. Nice try.

what rot tora

Question Author

TTT

Not at all.

The default position that we should take is that we shoudl take claims of sexual assualt and rape seriously. Too many woman have to fight to be heard and too many crimes go unreported because of the fear they won't be believed.

I would've posted this question whoever the accused was - because it's so extreme.

Question Author

Very well said youngmafbog.

 

8 and a half years for perverting the course of justice - augurs well for those involved in the Post Office scandal who should be charged witht the same offence getting their just desserts.....

Any woman wouldn't do that.  She has to be mentally ill.

so no woman is mentally ill ? Logic showing its welcome beaming face again on AB

righto! yes, in ag ood mood on my way to Bouremouth

^^ that's even more gobbledygook than usual, PP

The default position that we should take is that we shoudl take claims of sexual assualt and rape seriously.

this crosses the time when

The default position that we should take is that we should believe claims of sexual assualt and rape.

and that puts the defendant in the position of being invited to disprove ( hear your side of) the allegations - see bath baby posts.

Ay am v sensitive on this subject - like the police man who believed my accuser really seemed to believe her. 

Like I had used a blue camera ! (" what? to take a blue picture? I asked incredulously, yup)

 

that's even more gobbledygook than usual, PP

dat gobbledegooky - it is meant to be dammit ( irony and all that).

If I say 2+2 =5 to show something is rubbish, you dont fink " dat PP he mad he is, he fink 2+2=5!"

actually you may: brain on brainiac !

that's even more gobbledygook than usual, PP

you're not that policeman are you? the one who cd not understand the statement " I did not do that"

21 to 40 of 45rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Why Would Any Woman Do This???

Answer Question >>