Another One Bites The Dust.

gulliver1 | 10:24 Wed 18th Oct 2023 | News

61 Answers

Peter Bone MP. Tory. Suspended for indecent exposure.

Just another By-election for the Tories to lose.

Keep them coming🤣

Biden

Hate Speech?

Answers

41 to 60 of 61

First Previous 1 2 3 4 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by gulliver1. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.

naomi24

In fairness, khandro, if he did what he's accused of he's a nasty, dirty old man. I just wish people wouldn't leave it so long to complain.

gulliver1

Question Author

Naomi 18.26 "Nasty dirty old man" with a blue lead pencil🤣 OK.

naomi24

Gulliver, grow up.

webbo3

Wheres Nick Brown and what did he do?

gulliver1

Question Author

Naomi 18,33 You are the one that described Boney Peter as a "A nasty ,dirty old man"@ 18.26.Perhaps you are the one that should grow up OK .

naomi24

No, not ok, Gulliver. Grow up.

-- answer removed --

Khandro

naomi: //khandro, if he did what he's accused of he's a nasty, dirty old man. //

But we don't know what he's been accused of 11 years ago; "indecent exposure" has been levelled at him -- where & how? Was he having a pee? Why have police not been involved ?

Peter Bone isn't a "a nasty, dirty old man." he's a strong Brexiteer & Conservative & as such has created lots of lefty enemies viz this pathetic (anonymous) staffer.

You talk of 'fairness', then show some.

-- answer removed --

tomus42

//removing answers, that you personally disagree with.//

They all do it eventually.

Khandro - none of us know for sure what he's done yet, so perhaps you are being just as silly in defending him unconditionally.

-- answer removed --

THECORBYLOON

KHANDRO

The report from the Independent Expert Panel states,

“2.90 The complainant alleged that the respondent [Peter Bone] booked a shared room in a hotel. In the hotel room, the twin beds were together, and on arrival the complainant, although the respondent did not want him to, move them apart. At one point the respondent, wearing only a towel, complained that the shower in the bathroom did not seem to be working properly and called the complainant in to look at it. While the complainant was bending down to do that, the respondent dropped his towel, stood extremely close and exposed his genitals at a level with and close to the complainant’s face. After his shower, the respondent stood naked in the bedroom, talking to the complainant, as if trying to get him to look at him. As a result, the complainant made it clear that he felt uncomfortable. He felt intimidated and concerned that there might be repeated behaviour.”

“2.94 The respondent, who denies the allegation, submits that exposure alone does not necessarily constitute sexual conduct. We agree that mere nudity, depending on the context, may not be enough. The context will demonstrate if it is just nudity, as in showers in a gym, or something more. Here, in our view, it was considerably more.

2.95 In the first place it is remarkable that a senior MP in his 60s should think it appropriate that he should be sharing a bedroom and bathroom with his employee, and an employee in his early 20s. That in itself rings alarm bells. But from an objective standpoint, the respondent’s conduct in exposing himself in this way, with his genitals close to this young employee’s face, in an unwanted intimate context in a confined space, was not mere nudity. It was indecent exposure. There can be no doubt about it. Once the complainant’s account was believed, which it was, the outcome was inevitable. Objectively, this was sexual misconduct: it was conduct of a sexual nature which was non-consensual; it was unwanted behaviour which was perceived by the complainant as sexual, and rightly so, and it was intimidating.”

https://www.parliament.uk/globalassets/mps-lords--offices/standards-and-financial-interests/independent-expert-panel/hc-1904---the-conduct-of-mr-peter-bone-mp.pdf