Donate SIGN UP

Answers

1 to 10 of 10rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
He has, really. Spent the best years of his life free as a bird.
Another case of the appalling Judiciary - the judge threw out the original case so it didn't even go to a jury.

This judge showed more sense.
He was only convicted because of DNA evidence that would not have been available in 1975
This seems to have run for an eternity, TTT.
Words that are like a cold blade in our hearts:
'There was "very significant suffering before death" - with the judge calling it a "horrific, violent and sustained ordeal".'

If Jacqueline's family are delighted with the result then that is good enough for me, plus the thought that he probably will end his days in jail and rue the loss of his freedom.

Barry, that's no excuse - he had injuries caused by her fighting back, but the stupid judge rejected this.
Should be swinging. And not the good way.
youngmafbog, i agree and not just him, but all the other cretins like him, id gladly pull the lever...really.
I think past crimes will catch up with a lot of people now. I've been watching forensic science programmes on tv, many of murders decades ago, with dna taken at the time when forensic tests were in their infancy. With new technology these cases are now being reopened and killers caught. The familial data base is playing a big part, when a close relatives dna is on the database, even if the killer's isn't. Very interesting.
// he probably will end his days in jail //

He'll be 100 years of age or more before being eligible to apply for parole.
There isn't a separate familial DNA database, they just look for matches on the National Database for indications of a close relative.

"The technique uses standard STR-based DNA profiles and ranks the likelihood of a familial relationship between an unknown individual who has left DNA at a crime scene and individuals on the National DNA Database. This technique can only identify parents, children or siblings and the success rate is around 20%."

1 to 10 of 10rss feed

Do you know the answer?

I Bet This Savage Thought He'd Got Away With It......

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.