Donate SIGN UP

Ok How Long Before We Are Allowed To Mention The Elephant In The Room?

Avatar Image
ToraToraTora | 16:00 Fri 19th Oct 2018 | News
72 Answers
Gravatar

Answers

41 to 60 of 72rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Guilbert - // I guess if you force a very young girl to take drugs and consume high levels of alcohol she will become trash. //

No - she will become an abuse victim.

No innocent victim of abuse is ever 'trash'.
The elephant in the room is the length of time it took to act when the parents were saying it was happening - kick off 2004

//I'm really surprised that the ringleader is a Sikh, isn't this a first? I hold the Sikh community in high esteem,//

I was surprised - to see a photo of him in Sikh garb showing he was practising - a religion where Guru Nanak says the protection of women and children is an imperative
anneasquith
I see no elephants. I do see an informative post prior to this one .



Informed you of what?
Cowardly politicians and plod allowed this to go on.
Any body with a third world heritage is suspect due to their primitive cultural worldviews.
Notice @20.07 once again trying to misrepresent what another poster actually alluded to @17.45?
I am also surprised that the the ringleader is a Sikh - I had them down as reliable and non-threatening (but there is always the oddity I suppose). Point is that these poor girls were treated horribly (anyone else been alone on a Yorkshire moor at night? - I was on a sponsored walk - it is frightening and disorientating). The elephant in the room has been made public - but I doubt that any good will come of it - they are too well dug in.
Interesting - a couple of posters claim to be 'surprised' that a Sikh is the ringleader of this odious collection of degenerates, yet on a daily basis, a large number of AB'ers accept that terrorism by Islamists is simply a natural by-product of worshiping as a Muslim.

I for one am not surprised in the slightest!

I have no problem accepting that the deepest darkest actions of psychopaths around the world have no link to any faith, save the ability to twist its message to assuage their twisted souls.
I don't think it is surprising either.
Peodophile priests and vicars twist or ignore their chosen religion.
I know nothing of Sikhism.
Muslims follow the leader.
Mo had a 6 year old wife and consummated his marriage when Mrs Mo was only 9.
Totally in keeping with their leader.
Andres, //Not much chance of that apart from sending an Iman in to tell them they are unworthy to call themselves Muslims .//

Good luck with your search for an Imam who will tell them that.

//In Islam rape is a sin punishable by death .//

It isn’t that simple. A victim is rarely able to provide the four male witnesses she needs to support her allegation and is often blamed for enticing the man/men and stoned to death. So much for the wonderful culture we’re importing.

The perpetrators here were predominately Pakistani Muslims – no surprise there. Unlike them, the Sikh(s) involved in this case have not found motivation or justification for this in their religion. They’re just equally the worst of human trash.
Theland - // Mo had a 6 year old wife and consummated his marriage when Mrs Mo was only 9.
Totally in keeping with their leader. //

Jesus was happy to 'associate' with a prostitute - Mary Magdalen - I'm sure you can work out the connection yourself.
Interesting - a couple of posters are 'surprised' a Sikh is the ringleader of this collection, yet daily, a large number of AB'ers accept that terrorism by Islamists is simply a natural by-product of worshiping as a Muslim.

A is suprised by a sikh and so lots of Bs accept Muslims are animals

This is not logic as I know it

( or as AOG might say on a daily basis - the man Hughes has taken leave of his logical faculties)

- or made a frack-up of fallacious false farrago of .... er words fail me
andy-hughes,// Jesus was happy to 'associate' with a prostitute - Mary Magdalen //

You shouldn't believe the propaganda you learn on your regular visits to the Roman Catholic church. Mary Magdalene wasn't a prostitute - far from it - and the Roman Catholic church, after shamefully and disingenuously condemning her for centuries, now acknowledges that.
PP, //This is not logic as I know it //

Clearly.
Four witnesses bit
required for adultery not rape

This is, unfortunately, a very common and very serious misconception amongst many Muslims — not only the average Muslim, but Muslims who would call themselves scholars of Islam. The very short answer to the question is: No. Islam does not require a woman to produce any eye-witnesses to prove that she was raped.

ho hum normal day on AB
Quite right Naomi^^^The Imans are probably all frightened as to what would happen to them if they said anything. I just wish all the followers of this so called 'religion of peace' would get together and do something about the cancer in their communities. It's not as though all the acccused are young single men a lot of them are married with children themselves.Disgusting!
Peter Pedant, you're mistaken. A normal day on AB.
andres, //The Imans are probably all frightened as to what would happen to them if they said anything.//

I doubt that. They're very aware of what Islamic literature teaches - and that is beyond reproach. They couldn't condemn it if they wanted to.
Andy what is your point?
They are not a cancer in their communities, they are a cancer in our communities.

41 to 60 of 72rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Ok How Long Before We Are Allowed To Mention The Elephant In The Room?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.