Donate SIGN UP

Answers

21 to 40 of 56rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by webbo3. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Oh Diane...at the very least, you should've had a smartphone with a calaculator app ready to go.

100,000 sharing £80million means that each copper will be on £8,000 per year.

And that's just salary - not taking into account training, NI contributions, uniform, HR support etc.

Diane Abbott is the Natalie Bennett of 2017 (yes - remember her!)
100,000 sharing £80million means that each copper will be on £8,000 per year.


Are you sure, sp?
-- answer removed --
Thank God I'm not the Home Secretary.

10 years of doing calculations on my iPhone has left me with a complete inability to do sums in my head.

Jeremy - I'm here! Hire me!
Hang on - I've just re-read my post. Seriously - that was a typo. Abbott said £800million. I typed £80million.

Thank God - it's not my maths, but my typing skills that are questionable.
-- answer removed --
O'dear f this thread wasn't about a Labour politician mikey would pop along and say 'stop digging'
At least Rachel Riley knows her job is safe.
snap
I am the last person that is going to come on here to support Abbot...she clearly made a fool of herself today.

But look at the situation and look at what else she said....she said that there are 20,000 less Police now than in 2010. And she appears to be broadly correct.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39779288

Perhaps the Tories should be telling us why they have got rid of so many Police Officers in the last 7 years ?

Diane wants to join Shami as dame, she aint interested in menial politics.
Silly, silly, silly woman !
divebuddy

No - that's what I meant.

Abbott said that 100,000 coppers would cost £800million, which is nonsense. I made a typo - I was quoting her but left a zero off.

By the way - excellent point scoring.

I admire you.
Have another listen, sp
-- answer removed --
Abbott completely humiliated herself. Seriously embarrassing. Plus the sociopathic lying afterwards - "oh, how come I was able to do six other interviews?" as if it makes a jot of difference.

And yes, I say that as someone who if given a choice would still - even having heard this interview multiple times, as NJ suggested - choose the incompetent buffoon Abbott over the authoritarian Amber Rudd or her crooked boss. Would that I had better options in the coming election...
I've just listened to it...has anyone noticed how close it is to that episode of BBC's The Thick Of It?

D divebuddy - I think you're missing the point here. I'm not defending Abbott, I'm on the same side as you. You're wasting your energy here.
-- answer removed --
divebuddy

Grow up. You sound like a teenager right now.

Be a man.
-- answer removed --

21 to 40 of 56rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

10,000 Police Cost How Much.

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.