Quizzes & Puzzles0 min ago
So Why Shouldnt Heterosexual Couples Be Allow A Civil Partnership?
69 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by youngmafbog. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Perhaps the "gay community" object to civil partnerships for hetro couples because, as it stands it makes them feel in some way "special", or grants them an exclusive niche. You know all the people who crave acceptance, and understanding, but think the same sort of treatment for the majority somehow undermines their self worth. Why should say atheist male/ female couples have to go through with the charade of marriages in the eyes of God, when "Christian" same sex couples are spared the imposition?
///Perhaps the "gay community" object to civil partnerships for hetro couples because, as it stands it makes them feel in some way "special", or grants them an exclusive niche. You know all the people who crave acceptance, and understanding, but think the same sort of treatment for the majority somehow undermines their self worth.///
Perhaps that is a load of cobblers....
Perhaps that is a load of cobblers....
//Perhaps the "gay community" object to civil partnerships for hetro couples because, as it stands it makes them feel in some way "special", or grants them an exclusive niche.//
Or maybe they don't give a toss either way, the article spectacularly fails to make any mention of how gay couples feel so I guess this is just an opportunity to air some grievance on your part?
Or maybe they don't give a toss either way, the article spectacularly fails to make any mention of how gay couples feel so I guess this is just an opportunity to air some grievance on your part?
Certainly touched a "nerve" though didn't it . Haha.
// Mark Vernon is himself in a civil partnership, and the author of The Meaning of Friendship, argues that heterosexual couples, whether they like it or not, cannot escape the gender roles framed by centuries of marriage. Likewise, he says gay couples should embrace the opportunity to define civil partnerships on their own terms.//
Note that last line that contains the words "on their own terms". So a leading light in the "gay" literary world thinks that civil partnerships should be the sole right of his contemporaries. Not for heterosexual couples who carry "baggage" that is not evident in gay couples. If I had said that they would be howling at the moon for blood.
// Mark Vernon is himself in a civil partnership, and the author of The Meaning of Friendship, argues that heterosexual couples, whether they like it or not, cannot escape the gender roles framed by centuries of marriage. Likewise, he says gay couples should embrace the opportunity to define civil partnerships on their own terms.//
Note that last line that contains the words "on their own terms". So a leading light in the "gay" literary world thinks that civil partnerships should be the sole right of his contemporaries. Not for heterosexual couples who carry "baggage" that is not evident in gay couples. If I had said that they would be howling at the moon for blood.
Togo - picking one isoltated sentence by one individual and using it to float a view that an entire section of society embrace and echo the sentiment expressed is cherry-picking at it's most blatant.
It may bolster your view ion your mind - and heaven knows it needs all the bolstering it can get - but the majority of others would reject it as a carelessly worded opinion, rather than a set-in-stone fact.
It may bolster your view ion your mind - and heaven knows it needs all the bolstering it can get - but the majority of others would reject it as a carelessly worded opinion, rather than a set-in-stone fact.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.