Donate SIGN UP
Home > News > Should Princesses Beatrice And Eugenie Be Given Full-Time Royal Roles?

Should Princesses Beatrice And Eugenie Be Given Full-Time Royal Roles?

Avatar Image
anotheoldgit | 14:58 Sun 23rd Oct 2016 | News
66 Answers
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3863928/Queen-centre-row-sons-Prince-Charles-blocks-Prince-Andrew-s-request-Beatrice-Eugenie-given-time-royal-roles.html

Talk about 'passing the book'.

/// The Queen reportedly passed the matter on to her Private Secretary, who in turn referred it to Prince Charles. ///

/// Charles suggested a member of Government should tell Andrew his daughters would not be given the roles, it is claimed. ///

prev Why Does Jimmyk Care About Brexit Talks?
  
next Ghost Patients?
Gravatar

Answers

41 to 60 of 66rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Avatar Image tonyav
Oi, you can look but not touch ;-)
22:54 Sun 23rd Oct 2016
Avatar Image Mamyalynne
Harrumph..
22:55 Sun 23rd Oct 2016
Avatar Image tonyav
Oh ok then, but only a little one ;-)
23:00 Sun 23rd Oct 2016
Avatar Image Tashi
That's what they all say ;)
23:01 Sun 23rd Oct 2016
Avatar Image Mamyalynne
pinch...........legs it.........
23:01 Sun 23rd Oct 2016
Avatar Image Mamyalynne
I'll scare him with a gravy jug later Tash.
23:02 Sun 23rd Oct 2016
Avatar Image tonyav
Ahhhhhgggggggg, she said the G word.
23:03 Sun 23rd Oct 2016
Avatar Image Tashi
Looks like it has worked already
23:04 Sun 23rd Oct 2016
Avatar Image jno
Anne was the busiest royal last year - 544 engagements, more than 10 a week.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/630738/Royal-engagement-Queen-William-Kate-Charles-Princess-Anne
23:58 Sun 23rd Oct 2016
Avatar Image Mamyalynne
I feel in the strong possibility of getting my knuckles rapped tomorrow - apologies to AOG for being flippant on a News thread.
00:00 Mon 24th Oct 2016
Avatar Image anneasquith
She deserves recognition, she has full time job, puts her brothers to shame.
00:02 Mon 24th Oct 2016
Avatar Image youngmafbog
If I had my way none of them would have a role full stop.

But if we must have them then I dont care so long as no more money is extracted from the Tax Payer.
08:34 Mon 24th Oct 2016
Avatar Image Marshwarble
I think the Queen and the rest of the Royals are self employed. Are you suggesting that the PM can hire and fire them?
08:40 Mon 24th Oct 2016
Avatar Image andy-hughes
I think we should be scaling back the Royal Family in terms of a drain on the public purse.

As the older ones die / retire, we should move towards a far smaller and more informal monarchy with less pomp and less cost.
08:58 Mon 24th Oct 2016
Avatar Image mikey4444
I am with YMB here, 100%. There enough royals as it is...we don't need any more !
09:13 Mon 24th Oct 2016
Avatar Image tamborine
They just want a buckshee London pad
09:55 Mon 24th Oct 2016
Avatar Image anneasquith
They have buckshee London pads in Kensington palace, daddy wants them to have bigger ones.
13:17 Mon 24th Oct 2016
Avatar Image Bazile
Why isn't Andrew bald yet ?
13:22 Mon 24th Oct 2016
Avatar Image hereIam
To answer the OP, no, No, NO !!!
13:39 Mon 24th Oct 2016
Avatar Image anneasquith
Bazile. He didn't get the " premature bald gene " ?
13:44 Mon 24th Oct 2016

41 to 60 of 66rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Should Princesses Beatrice And Eugenie Be Given Full-Time Royal Roles?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.