Donate SIGN UP

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-mid-wales-36130437

Avatar Image
mikey4444 | 19:03 Mon 25th Apr 2016 | News
58 Answers
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-36128693

All revealed at 11:00 Tuesday....batten down the hatches...its going to be a bumpy ride.
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 58rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by mikey4444. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Why? It happened 27 years ago. The victims are dead and cannot be resurrected. What is the point?
A majority verdict by 7 of 9. I don't call that very decisive!
That is only on the crucial question as to if it was unlawful killing though.
...and why just '..' as a question title? That is the hallmark of trolls and spammers.
// Why? It happened 27 years ago. The victims are dead and cannot be resurrected. What is the point?//

it hasnt wrecked the lives of the 98 dead but the families - say 4 each that is 400 lives who have for the last 25 y suffered the slagging off of their dead relatives

stories of drunkness - urinating on bodies - all untrue and possibly peddled by those who wished to deflect justified criticism.
that is those who were there to protect, instead used their powers to cover up their mistakes having failed to protect

other than that .... yeah complete waste of money

not one of Mrs Y's finest hours - she is also the one who crawled over the innocent irish bombers files - " do we have to go thro all this again ? " and basically believed the people she wanted and needed to

my tip for the top is accidental death aggravated by negligence
Question Author
Jack...the only purpose of an Inquest is to investigate the cause of death....this was not done properly on the first occasion. That is "the point"
as you put it.

To be frank, I find your comments offensive...if it had been your young son who died at Hillsborough, I am quite sure you would want to know why.

Lets not forget why there has been this second Inquest.....primarily because the Police lied through their teeth in the first one.

The families of the 96 have waited a long time for this moment. After two years of this new Inquest, perhaps we will know the truth at last. And not before time.
Jack...that was a bit cold hearted.
it should have been done properly the first time

was this the inquest where the coroner broke for Xmas and said
I wish everyone a good christmas and a prosperous new year
( lawyers and their fees see ? ) and the audience gasped ....

A family member died 27 years ago, tomorrow you will know the reason ( that is the point )
I had absolutely no intention of being offensive to anyone, though I note that you frequently take 'offence' to comments with which you disagree. No matter what the verdict, no further action will be forthcoming.
Question Author
Jack...at what time over the last 27 years did it become pointless ?

After the first Inquest, the one where the Police lied ? Or at some other point in history ?

When exactly did it go from very important to know the cause of death to pointless ?
I expect a blizzard of clichés and platitudes following the verdict.
Lessons learned etc and no effect whatsoever on pensions or subsequent career progessions gained since.
If it helps the families of the dead then fine but like all British enquiries it ends up with a posh bloke mumbling the same old stuff then waiting for his next gig.

So, why did you use a rather meaningless '...' as a thread title?
// No matter what the verdict, no further action will be forthcoming.//

jackie you have missed the point of a coroners inquest ( under the old 1888 act ) which was not a point on a journey ( or decision node ) but a process in itself- who died where and when and why

admittedly at the Gibraltar inquests - completely different - the IRA lawyer said of the really truncated inquest - 'all we are going to find is that he four people are dead but we know that already ...'
Question Author
Jack...I will disagree with anyone that has expressed the cold-hearted comments made by you this evening.

If you are going to make comments like you have this evening, you must expect some flack. After all, I am hardly the only one on here tonight to disagree with you, so please don't make it personal.
I apologise, and shall make no further comment on this topic. Clearly it is much more emotional for other posters. As someone not involved I should not have stuck my oar in.
Doug - I think the coroner has allowed a narrative verdict

the cliches come later - outside court
jack I think butting out is a good idea
oop t north it is a sore subject....
Question Author
What "meaningless '...' Baldric ?

When the verdicts are read out at 11:00 tomorrow, I predict that all hell will be let loose.
Question Author
Jack...we are crossing in the post here ! I fully accept your apology...thank you.

Look at the title of your thread in 'Latest Posts'

1 to 20 of 58rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-mid-wales-36130437

Answer Question >>