Donate SIGN UP

Answers

1 to 18 of 18rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
oh look, theres that word they like "could"...not will but always could
Notice they are not saying will not if we stay in. Mortgage rates are going to rise pretty soon regardless of what happens. They have to. Interest rates in general are due a rise also.
Did he say anything about the banks causing massive problems by their massive incompetence TTT?
Interest rates are going to rise soon anyway.
O
M
G

Interest rates can go up as well as down?


///banks causing massive problems by their massive incompetence///

Could you be a little more explicit please TWR, who knows, some may even agree with you?
In other words Baldric, can you believe anything they say.

in terms of ?
I am surprised anyone wants to 'stay in' with the likes of Cameron and Blair leading the 'stay in' campaign.
Question Author
.....yeah AOG and that's not to mention Paddy Pantsdown and Kinnochio!
Project fear is in full swing.
out ..out..out ...out !!!
It is mendacious in the extreme. To claim that each household would be £4,300 p.a. worse off is simply not true.
murraymints, your Great Leader wants you to vote STAY. You must obey her.
@Jackdaw

Someone, on the Beeb, reduced it to a percentage of household income and extrapolated that it would take a household income of £80,000 to lose £4,300.

What kind of household has two £40k earners in it?

La-la land figures, or someone has stuffed up, with their maths.

//What kind of household has two £40k earners in it? \\

The Kinnocks, perhaps?




@Jackdaw

"The regions", by which I mean… no, rather than a list, I'll lump them together as "places away from London and the south east", will have to beg funding from Westminster, once Brexit chiefs have their hands on the levers.

Currently, they benefit from the EU, injecting cash into schemes Westminster would likely disapprove of. If SNP are keen on IN, then that's a tacit acknowledgement that the EU is their teat (milk courtesy of the three/four net contributor countries).

It's socialism in action, innit? Rich places having their taxes whisked away, to help poor places and resenting it because they have no intention of ever visiting.

(This from my running theme of "we're paving roads in eastern European countries, to help German trucks shift goods").

If the remoter parts of Britain appear to have shady attitudes to mass migration it is only because that is an encapsulation of their own lifestyle: having to extract every last drop from their provincial school, get to Uni and get a halfway decent job in the big city - because there's b*g all on offer locally, unless you're either related to people who run interesting things or if you happen to actually *like* working in tourism or farming.

(Sorry if this sounds bitter but I am on the wrong end of the family being moved from the south east into a rural area. I am offspring of an (English) migrant. Not sure if I 'belong', wherever I go).

1 to 18 of 18rss feed

Do you know the answer?

More Scare Mongering From The In Crowd?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.