News0 min ago
Charlie Sheen Is Hiv Positive?
55 Answers
http://
/// The actor Charlie Sheen has disclosed that he is HIV positive, in a television interview that followed weeks of speculation about his condition. ///
He has known of his condition for about four years, so considering that he admits to having sex with thousands of women, his he now liable to face numerous compensation claims?
/// The actor Charlie Sheen has disclosed that he is HIV positive, in a television interview that followed weeks of speculation about his condition. ///
He has known of his condition for about four years, so considering that he admits to having sex with thousands of women, his he now liable to face numerous compensation claims?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
"He's an actor and he's been paying people to keep it quiet. "
What, the fact that he's an actor? :-)
Sorry for the confusion. I don't really know who these people are. I just find it amusing that headlines in a national newspaper (which some may term one of good reputation) describes somebody's medical history.
What, the fact that he's an actor? :-)
Sorry for the confusion. I don't really know who these people are. I just find it amusing that headlines in a national newspaper (which some may term one of good reputation) describes somebody's medical history.
-- answer removed --
Judge Dregg was a fictional character who appears in British comic books and Judge Deed is also a fictional character played by the actor Martin Shaw.
Whereas Judge Rinder is actually a real life barrister who happens to be gay, and features in a series on TV which is the British version of American Judge Judy.
Whereas Judge Rinder is actually a real life barrister who happens to be gay, and features in a series on TV which is the British version of American Judge Judy.
AOG
To answer your initial question - if he knowingly passed the virus on, then he may be liable for compensation claims.
However, first of all we do not know whether he engaged in penetrative sex, or of he did, whether he used protection.
Furthermore, it would be encumbant on the claimant to prove that he knowingly passed the infection on, and that they were free of infection prior to sexual engagement.
This may be possible, because add riding to reports, he had sex with adult movie actresses, and in that industry it's common practice for performers to have certified HIV screenings.
To answer your initial question - if he knowingly passed the virus on, then he may be liable for compensation claims.
However, first of all we do not know whether he engaged in penetrative sex, or of he did, whether he used protection.
Furthermore, it would be encumbant on the claimant to prove that he knowingly passed the infection on, and that they were free of infection prior to sexual engagement.
This may be possible, because add riding to reports, he had sex with adult movie actresses, and in that industry it's common practice for performers to have certified HIV screenings.
Yes you can easily understand my confusion. I have also just discovered that Judge Deed's daughter (in the series, that is, not in real life) is Charlie Deed. There's so many Charlies in all of this I just can't keep up!!! :-)
I still find it odd that this makes the papers. I understand the "gentleman" in question may have had quite a few lady friends and may want to get his news out to them as quickly as possible, but I cannot help but think splashing it over the newspapers is hardly the most sensitive way to go about it !!!
I still find it odd that this makes the papers. I understand the "gentleman" in question may have had quite a few lady friends and may want to get his news out to them as quickly as possible, but I cannot help but think splashing it over the newspapers is hardly the most sensitive way to go about it !!!
erm no whilst he didnt know
and yes after - but he says it was limited to two
and he has been paying out compensation over the last few years to 'friends' who were blackmailing him
and yes it may be possible to identify those coming forward he did and didnt infect as the mutation rate is high so if the viruses are closely related - yes - and if the viruses differ a lot then no
and yes after - but he says it was limited to two
and he has been paying out compensation over the last few years to 'friends' who were blackmailing him
and yes it may be possible to identify those coming forward he did and didnt infect as the mutation rate is high so if the viruses are closely related - yes - and if the viruses differ a lot then no
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.