Should These Three Even Be Considered For Asylum?

[anotheoldgit]

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/608893/Khaled-El-Azibi-Naji-El-Maarfi-Mohammed-Abdalsalam-Libya-soldiers-asylum

[ummmm]

1389 voters have all said NO.

[joggerjayne]

Asylum? Isn't that a procedure for protecting the innocent and vulnerable when they are not safe in their home country?

Has it just become a short cut way of applying for UK residence?

[Gromit]

They are entitled to apply.

Those applications will certainly be rejected.

I doubt this thread will cause much debate, but will be a welcome space for those wanting to vent some racist and xenophobic diatribes. Glad I got in and out of this thread early.

[anotheoldgit]

Gromit

/// Glad I got in and out of this thread early. ///

Nobody forced you to enter it in the first place, you would have then left more room for the 'racists' and 'xenophobics'.

I mean we cannot have foreign sexual abusers of our women being criticised, can we?

[andy-hughes]

AOG - //I mean we cannot have foreign sexual abusers of our women being criticised, can we?/

It has nothing to do with the victims being 'our women' which implies that the assaults are somehow more serious because they are committed against white British women.

But to answer your OP - no they should not be considered.

I understand that they are entitled to apply.

I would also assume the Government are equally entitled to refuse.

[anotheoldgit]

andy-hughes

/// It has nothing to do with the victims being 'our women' which implies that the assaults are somehow more serious because they are committed against white British women. ///

Ah out once more from the covers, the 'hughe's race card'.

'Our' women was used to describe our own women, the woman of the United Kingdom, those who these three pieces of foreign trash sexually assaulted

Who said anything about the colour of 'our women' in fact even the report did not state what colour they were, only in your own mind did that vision exist, and that is saying more about you, then it could ever say about me.

[andy-hughes]

AOG - //'Our' women was used to describe our own women, the woman of the United Kingdom, those who these three pieces of foreign trash sexually assaulted //

Your reply simply underlines my point.

I perceive a level of outrage in your statement, not that women are assaulted, but that 'our' women are assaulted by 'three pieces of foreign trash'.

The nerve!

[jackthehat]

1. No, they shouldn't.
2. Your personal attacks/comments/call them what you will against andy-hughes are utterly tedious and beneath someone who likes to inhabit the moral high-ground.
Please stop them.

[andy-hughes]

Thank you jack.

[Baldric]

No, they should be removed ASAP!

[andy-hughes]

Baldric - //No, they should be removed ASAP! //

What - the asylum seekers, or AOG's posts?

[Mamyalynne]

Their applications should be given consideration for just the scant few seconds it takes to stamp them 'Rejected'.

[tonyav]

Or filed under B for bin.

[Svejk]

No need for you to gang up on AOG, jack. Andy is a very opinionated poster who can, and does, stand up for himself.

[jackthehat]

I am posting on my own behalf, svejk, and I'm sure AOG can answer 'me' for himself, if he is so inclined.
No need for you to act as his agent.

[Baldric]

//Should These Three Even Be Considered For Asylum?//

\\No, they should be removed ASAP!\\

Hope that clears things up for you AH.

[baza]

They commited crimes, they did their time, why are they still here, they should have gone straight from the nick to the airport.

[sandyRoe]

The authorities should reject their claim but will the courts when they appeal? They could argue that they've besmirched the fair name of their country and if returned would face more punishment.