divebuddy - //andy. for gawds sake don't start your usual hair splitting routine over what one particular word may or may not mean. These pics were clearly, obviously, explicit. Or they wouldn't be an issue would they.//
Racking up the severity of the issue by inserting words that are not in the link, regarding pictures you have not seen and therefore cannot judge the severity of , is not 'splitting hairs'.
If we are going to debate the evidence we have, that's fine - adding words because of an unfounded decision you have reached all on your own is not debating correctly - is it?