Crosswords1 min ago
Should Former Police Chief David Duckenfield Be Stripped Of His Police Pension?
He won't face charges for this (as he has health issues) , but he should be stripped of his police pension at the very least.
http://
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by barney15c. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Perjury is a crime and not a tort
christ what does that mean ?
It means that you cant go into court and say this man has injured me thro his disgusting perjury, so I want money aka damages - loss of a child, loss of his income and loss of companionship and twenty years heart pain
and since Perjury is not a tort = civil wrong, even judge judy would say get arta here
however good news boys
series of cases on psychiatric injury - and the police present were allowed to sue their employer a certain chief constabel for post traumatic stress disorder -he failed to give them a safe place t work
and the parents who saw it on telelvision were NOT - as in a technical sense their injury altho foreseeable ... was too remote
http://
and ALcock and Hicks v Chief Constable .... here
http://
christ what does that mean ?
It means that you cant go into court and say this man has injured me thro his disgusting perjury, so I want money aka damages - loss of a child, loss of his income and loss of companionship and twenty years heart pain
and since Perjury is not a tort = civil wrong, even judge judy would say get arta here
however good news boys
series of cases on psychiatric injury - and the police present were allowed to sue their employer a certain chief constabel for post traumatic stress disorder -he failed to give them a safe place t work
and the parents who saw it on telelvision were NOT - as in a technical sense their injury altho foreseeable ... was too remote
http://
and ALcock and Hicks v Chief Constable .... here
http://
// It wasn't a mistake to lie after the fact though - that was premeditated.//
I am not sure if it was premeditated - as in planned before - but I regret that no one at the time had the Bells to tell Mrs Thatcher that this was a complete cack-up
Instead they said, Yeah Miss the scousers are animals
now where is my *** great big pay rise - promotion - fat pension and visits to the palace ?
I just regret the lack of integrity in those set over us to rule us
I am not sure if it was premeditated - as in planned before - but I regret that no one at the time had the Bells to tell Mrs Thatcher that this was a complete cack-up
Instead they said, Yeah Miss the scousers are animals
now where is my *** great big pay rise - promotion - fat pension and visits to the palace ?
I just regret the lack of integrity in those set over us to rule us
An analogy:
Every single day in this country a heart specialist or brain surgeon (or other medical specialist) will make a decision which he/she thinks is in the best interests of his/her patient but which actually leads to their death. (I've actually had a conversation with a heart surgeon where he told me "I've probably killed dozens of patients in my time; you try to get it right every time but it's simply not possible").
David Duckenfield made a decision which, at the time, he regarded as being in the best interests of crowd safety. You don't prosecute (or vilify) heart surgeons for their mistakes, so why should DD be any different?
Every single day in this country a heart specialist or brain surgeon (or other medical specialist) will make a decision which he/she thinks is in the best interests of his/her patient but which actually leads to their death. (I've actually had a conversation with a heart surgeon where he told me "I've probably killed dozens of patients in my time; you try to get it right every time but it's simply not possible").
David Duckenfield made a decision which, at the time, he regarded as being in the best interests of crowd safety. You don't prosecute (or vilify) heart surgeons for their mistakes, so why should DD be any different?
3T // surprised she's not getting the blame for this.//
she hasnt just spent two days in the witness box and admitted she had previously lied
so no, I am not surprised she is not getting the blame....
[ altho she did scribble in the margin of one of the papers wondering if the now-proven-innocent Irish non-bombers were innocent after all " Oh do we have to go thro all this again ?" ]
she hasnt just spent two days in the witness box and admitted she had previously lied
so no, I am not surprised she is not getting the blame....
[ altho she did scribble in the margin of one of the papers wondering if the now-proven-innocent Irish non-bombers were innocent after all " Oh do we have to go thro all this again ?" ]
Its taken 25 years to get to the truth and what happened in court yesterday was a bombshell moment. The Police lied....we all knew that anyway but at last, one of them have admitted the fact.
As NJ has pointed out, people make mistakes in the course of their work, and that is to expected from time to time. But this man lied for 25 years, until yesterday.
I feel nothing but contempt for that lie, and him.
As NJ has pointed out, people make mistakes in the course of their work, and that is to expected from time to time. But this man lied for 25 years, until yesterday.
I feel nothing but contempt for that lie, and him.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.