I think the findings of the mid-staffs review were that a narrow focus on chasing targets, whilst at the same time making large cuts in the finances of the hospital in order to meet the targets set by Monitor to achieve Foundation Trust status were what underpinned much of what went wrong in Mid-Staffs.
That cannot be the only problem though; the way some of the patients on the wards were treated was truly appalling, and it appears that the patients were forgotten or became secondary to doing the business of the system. It does not stop just at nursing care either; There was a tolerance of poor standards at clinician level.
I have lost track now of how much exposure to hands on care and nursing student nurses within the system get nowadays. It seems to me though that many of the Professions Aliied to Medicine have attempted to confer additional respectability upon their Profession, by moving to graduate-only entry for example, and that was and is a mistake, IMO. Many of the disciplines should have a substantial vocational element contained within them, so that candidates properly understand what the job requires.
Re-introducing a vocational element by having student nurses work as supervised health care assistants for 1 year within their overall training programme strikes me as being a good thing...
And if you are interested, a link to the executive summary of the findings of the mid-staffs enquiry - it makes for harrowing reading....
http://www.midstaffspublicinquiry.com/sites/default/files/report/Executive%20summary.pdf