Quizzes & Puzzles0 min ago
Oooh Prince Harry!!
40 Answers
Naked photos in vegas eh?
Granny wont be pleased!???
My eyes are!
LOL x
Granny wont be pleased!???
My eyes are!
LOL x
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by tinkerbell23. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Here you go!! http://
Here we are from the Guardian:
"Clarence House confirmed that the grainy mobile phone pictures, taken in Las Vegas and published online by TMZ early on Wednesday, UK time, are genuine, but declined to comment further.
However, royal aides are understood to have moved quickly to warn British media organisations not to republish the embarrassing photographs.
The prince, who is third in line to the throne, is shown without clothing in two pictures taken on his trip to Las Vegas.
Royal aides are understood to be urging the British media to respect the prince's privacy and not republish the photographs, which are likely to have been taken without his consent.
British newspapers have published numerous pictures of Harry's trip to Las Vegas this week, where he has been seen partying with the US Olympic swimmer Ryan Lochte.
TMZ has risen to prominence in recent years with a string of showbiz exclusives, including being the first to report Michael Jackson's death in 2009.
The publication of the photographs marks a new level of media intrusion into the lives of the royal family.
Royal aides suggested that Clarence House may contact the Press Complaints Commission if the pictures are used by British publications. The PCC declined to confirm whether it had been contacted by Clarence House.
Each of the major British newspapers chose not to use them in online stories by late on Wednesday, although they were published by the Ireland-based Westminster gossip blog, *** Fawkes.
The reticence of the British media is likely to be interpreted by some in the industry as further evidence of a chilling effect caused by the Leveson inquiry into media ethics. Tabloid executives, including the Sun editor Dominic Mohan and the Mail Online publisher Martin Clarke, have complained to the inquiry that they could be forced out of business if they are unable to publish material that is put online by media organisations in other countries and widely available on the internet."
"Clarence House confirmed that the grainy mobile phone pictures, taken in Las Vegas and published online by TMZ early on Wednesday, UK time, are genuine, but declined to comment further.
However, royal aides are understood to have moved quickly to warn British media organisations not to republish the embarrassing photographs.
The prince, who is third in line to the throne, is shown without clothing in two pictures taken on his trip to Las Vegas.
Royal aides are understood to be urging the British media to respect the prince's privacy and not republish the photographs, which are likely to have been taken without his consent.
British newspapers have published numerous pictures of Harry's trip to Las Vegas this week, where he has been seen partying with the US Olympic swimmer Ryan Lochte.
TMZ has risen to prominence in recent years with a string of showbiz exclusives, including being the first to report Michael Jackson's death in 2009.
The publication of the photographs marks a new level of media intrusion into the lives of the royal family.
Royal aides suggested that Clarence House may contact the Press Complaints Commission if the pictures are used by British publications. The PCC declined to confirm whether it had been contacted by Clarence House.
Each of the major British newspapers chose not to use them in online stories by late on Wednesday, although they were published by the Ireland-based Westminster gossip blog, *** Fawkes.
The reticence of the British media is likely to be interpreted by some in the industry as further evidence of a chilling effect caused by the Leveson inquiry into media ethics. Tabloid executives, including the Sun editor Dominic Mohan and the Mail Online publisher Martin Clarke, have complained to the inquiry that they could be forced out of business if they are unable to publish material that is put online by media organisations in other countries and widely available on the internet."
Latest Posts
Tree Slayers Case Moved To The Crown...
News27 mins ago
News30 mins ago
Man Told He Is Not British After 42...
News34 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.