Donate SIGN UP

The BNP - what a bunch of crooks

Avatar Image
kinkajou2 | 23:16 Thu 13th Oct 2011 | News
76 Answers
When they got 2 of their members elected to the Euro Parliament
instead of a feeling of achievement and validation - they saw it as
an opportunity to fill their boots with cash!!Surely they are finished
as a Party now!

Are the BNP and EDL mates?Do they work together for a common goal?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 76rss feed

1 2 3 4 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by kinkajou2. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
kinkajou2

I'm afraid you're wrong.

The BNP are aligned with the Women's Institutes and the Brownies. They are a group of like-minded individuals who eschew racism and have the best interests of all Brits, no matter what their racial background. For you to call them crooks is outrageous.

Seriously - have you got a link? Just interested to see what they're up to
(they've been quiet this year - possibly because a large proportion of their membership have been appearing on 'The Jeremy Kyle Show'.
Question Author
Thanks Buenchico - I know you are hot stuff with a puter
can you help please on the Welsh flag thread - I"m curious about febs link
ta kink :-)
Just the BNP is it? Do we not remember 'expenses'? (Oops! Sorry - they've been renamed 'allowances' now). I used to work at my local County Council - I'll say no more!

I think there must be some honest politicians around somewhere. I would like to think so. Still, let them blame the BNP.
i wondered when the bbc would publish some story this is after the bnp produced a video of the bbc

( i will not post the video or a link as the thread i started was removed )

the bnp publish a big list about people who worked for the bbc
ths is just a few

>> 3. The BBC and sexual depravity

BBC Presenter Peter Rowell

On 22 April 2011, Avon and Somerset Police announced that Rowell had been charged with four counts of indecent assault, dating back to the 1990s, and had been remanded in custody.

In May 2011, Rowell was charged with seven counts of possessing and making indecent images of children along with seven counts of indecent assault against girls under the age of 16.

On 9 June 2011, it was announced that Mr Rowell would stand to face charges relating to a fifth victim, including rape of a minor. He appeared in North Avon Magistrates' Court to face three new charges: two of indecent assault and one of rape against a 16-year-old victim.

He was released on bail, having had a curfew imposed by the courts. He was also ordered to surrender his passport. He returned to court on June 24 for a plea hearing on these latest charges and was released on bail with conditions attached until October 2011.

BBC Radio Bristol managing editor Tim Pemberton said: "Peter has worked for Radio Bristol for about a year now. His colleagues here respect and like him and the audience have responded very well to him."



BBC Producer Benjamin Wilkins

March 2010 – Secretly taped a series of sexual liaisons with TV and radio presenters using a hidden camera. He hid the CCTV device in a smoke alarm directly above his bed to record his encounters with a succession of ten lovers. Another camera was hidden in a 'moveable ornament' in his bathroom.

The "cool and calculating" broadcaster took the women back to his flat where he recorded them having sex with him.

Many of them hold senior positions in television and radio – both presenting and in production roles – but cannot be named for legal reasons.

One of his victims said he had left her feeling "violated, sick and dirty".

He was jailed for eight months and was ordered to sign the Sex Offender Register for ten years after admitting 11 counts of voyeurism, including filming five women and setting up the cameras.



BBC Radio Producer Andrew Brennand

September 2010 – Admitted seven counts of exposure and two of sexual assault. Describing him as a 'sexual predator' from whom 'no female in Burnley was safe', Judge Beverley Lunt sentenced Brennand to a three-year community order with supervision.

He must also attend a sex offender programme and receive psychological treatment.

His nine victims, some of them dog walkers, were aged between 15 and 60 and were said to have been 'left shocked, scared and very upset by his actions'. <<
DF -

It's always struck me in recent years how biased the BBC have become. As a public broadcaster their responsibility is to present all persons and subjects in a fair and as balanced a manner as possible. Yet they obviously do exactly the opposite and if they don't like someone or something, or it doesn't suit their agendas, they do everything they can to defame, discredit and destroy it.

I don't particularly like the BNP individuals I've seen. However, the BBC should realise that they are a public broadcaster and their only role is to reflect all views and people in society in a fair and balanced manner.
i agree with what you say, the video was very good to watch after the very short plug for the party but a ab member complained and the thread was removed
Andyvon:

I could not agree more. The BBC, far from being the impartial broadcaster it once was, is now extremely 'tabloid' in its reporting.
they will never treat all people the same
>> reflect all views and people in society in a fair and balanced manner. <<

from the web
>> As soon as an address is seen to be unregistered in respect of a TV licence, the occupant is subjected to an unending stream of letters, the constant message being that you are guilty of harbouring an unregistered TV. In the early stages, the letters are just accusatory but rapidly become bullying, insulting and finally intimidating and highly offensive. What other government organisation, business or even court of law would send out a letter in an envelope adorned in large print with the message 'Notice of impending prosecution' or 'Your next appearance could be in court'? This, when no evidence whatsoever of TV possession exists." . . . "Persecution is not too strong a word to describe the actions of TV Licensing and it beggars belief that such practices should be acceptable in society today." <<
To answer the OPs original question. Yes, some members of the BNP probably are crooks. Quite unlike members of all the other political parties in this cou.... oh, hang on....
Unfortunately, most Politicians are crooks and always will be, shame really the UK used to be a great Country!!!!
"most Politicians are crooks"

oh, yeah, right.

I believe the BBC doesn't actually collect the licence fee, it's outsourced, and I've been told it doesn't go to the BBC but to the government, which passes some but not all of it on to the BBC. I don't know if this is true, however.
As for claiming expenses i once claimed for 16 pints of miller light. off featured in the reply
// 12 months ago the BNP owed creditors more than £570,000. //

The BNP has 2 MEP who can claim £520,000 maximum expenses.

Party chairman Nick Griffin recently said the party now owes just £52,000.

It is clear the taxpayer, through the MEP expenses scheme is bankrolling the BNP. But I suppose they are for all the hundreds of other parties in Europe too.

I suppose the hypocrisy comes in that the BNP were elected opposing EU
gravytrains and opposing our large £ contributions, and now they happily take a first class carriage on the gravytrain and then allegedly produce false invoices to claim the maximum expenses.

5 Labour MPs went to jail for similar offenses. If proved guilty, the 2 MEPs could be representing me from behind bars at her majesty's pleasure.
-- answer removed --
I think you are in a very small minority Teddy Boy. Although many people don't like the BNP they are not as twisted and nasty as you obviously are.
They may be to you, but having watched the programme where they turned the tables on the BBC, and there is no doubt in my mind that the BBC are biased, was more than interesting. As to the fact of the licence fee, it's a rip off of mega proportions, and though can't confirm how the money is distributed, i object to having it spent in the way it does,
its a public broadcasting company, and one that needs taking down a peg or two.
// The Licence fee is a rip off of mega proportions //

Licence fee: £145.50

Minimum Sky package £234.00

I know which I think is value for money.
reported in a lot of papers this is from the mail

http://www.dailymail....oss-18m-contract.html
remember gromit you are not forced to give sky a penny it is your choice with the bbc you have no choice

1 to 20 of 76rss feed

1 2 3 4 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

The BNP - what a bunch of crooks

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.