sp1814's post is the exact point Ms Phillip's was making.
She says that there are many that would use the mass killings to get their political point over, and stir up additional hatred.
Take Sp's headline "Does Melanie have 'blood on her hands''? Why should she? She is only stating a point, and it is being sensualist to refer to 'Blood on her hands', if for example some harm came to Ms Phillips because of this thread, then could we say Sp equally had blood on his hands?
Ms Phillips does not write extensively on just Muslims, mass immigration, and the evils of Islam, she may comment from time to time on these subjects, because these subjects tend not to be spoken of, in fact anyone who dares to, is immediately branded a racist or a fascist, to somehow sweep these sensitive issues under the carpet, in the time honoured way.
'Evils of mass immigration', not EVILS, surely just concerns about mass immigration, which after all has caused many problems.
'Multiculturalism' This was an experiment that has been shown not to work.
'Evils of Islam' yes EVILS, throughout the world many evils have been committed, all in the name of this religion.
Ms Phillips has never denounced Muslims per se, she may have condemned those Muslims that have committed terrorists attacks, criticised those Muslims who are not prepared to condemn their fellow Muslims for their evil deeds, or fully integrate into British society.
Melanie Phillips may write on controversial subjects, but that is what her particular column is all about, just as some write on Politics, Fashion, Media Gossip, etc, etc.
It's called having the freedom of speech, in a free press.