Donate SIGN UP

Whose next to march?

Avatar Image
anotheoldgit | 16:50 Sun 12th Jun 2011 | News
89 Answers
http://www.independen...exuality-2296475.html

Oh dear, oh dear, perhaps there should be a march for 'DRUNKS' say?

They could carry boards saying 'DRUNK', 'ALCOHOLIC' etc.

They should feel free to drink as much as they like, without some attacking them in the street or calling for a ban on alcohol.

After all is it anybody's business how much they drink?
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 40 of 89rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
They are marching to change outdated attitudes on sexuality.

As in....just because a woman is wearing a short skirt doesn't mean she is up for it!!

Do you not agree with their sentiments AOG? Or do you think anyone who dresses like a '***' is asking for it?
He thinks even demure ladies who have said 'no' are up for it, as I recall........
Ahhh yes Jack....I think my answer got removed on that subject!!!
And he was a feminist yesterday. How quickly the lapse.
I really can't see any connection with people being drunk - a free choice - and wommen being assaulted - not a free choice.

Can you elaborate AOG?
I think AOG has interpreted the title of the march ('Slutwalk') as some kind of civil rights march for people who are prostitutes/act like them/dress like them. He appears to be using the example of an alcoholics march to sarchastically/tongue-in-cheek illustrate the ridiculousness of the Slutwalk march, as he sees it.

Unfortunately, it's not very funny (if I'm right of course that that's what he's doing). Because it completely misunderstands the march he's linked to and thus lacks any kind of insight or edge.

The point of the march, as AOG's link quite clearly describes, is to argue that women have the right to dress in a 'slutty' way if they want to without people using that to imply that it's their own fault if they get raped. The implication of what AOG has said, if I've read it right, is that this isn't a message he's particularly sympathetic to, for reasons he has yet to describe.
at a guess, I think he's suggesting women should no more be free to dress as they please than people should be free to drink as much as they want. Since I think both should be free to do so, subject to the usual laws about public nuisance, I can only agree.
Well I think it's hilarious, and AOG has gone up in my estimation.
Mike1111.....

OMG. What The Funicular. FY.
I think AOG just wanted to rant, even if he had no comprehension of what he was ranting about, he just couldn't help himself ...........He was in, auto pilot.
A march for drunk people? How about drug addicts too! I see the slogans now-
WE HAVE A RIGHT TO KILL OURSELVES AND/OR DECREASE OUR LIFE QUALITIES/LONGEVITY. then, PLEASE DIE AT THE WHIMS OF OUR MORE VIOLENT MEMBERS. OOOH! or for smokers -- SECOND HAND SMOKE IS MOST DEADLY. ALLOW ME TO REMOVE FROM YOU THE BURDENS OF THIS WORLD
It's friggin sad....
Oh dear, this makes Gay Pride marches look tame in comparison. "Whoops, I'm a fairy!"
Whose next to March, April ?
Question Author
Well I automatically thought that some ABers were intelligent enough to look into the deeper argument, but apparently not it seems, it is not about drunks per se hence the word 'perhaps'.

No my obviously misunderstood analogy, was a way to try and highlight the futility of these type of marches which try and change the public's perceptions on a particular issue, but obviously I failed.

Such persons as JTH started off the proceedings by correcting my spelling, which apparently she only bothers to do when she disagrees with certain persons points of view, this in turn started up the rest of the Anti AOG Brigade off and that doesn't take much.

The ED has told us time and time again to keep on track, but she and others apparently fail to obey the rule.
"Well I automatically thought that some ABers were intelligent enough to look into the deeper argument, but apparently not it seems, it is not about drunks per se hence the word 'perhaps'. "

You failed to communicate what you were saying, AOG - nobody is responsible for that but you. Grow a damn spine and stop whining.
it was just a 'thread-holding' exercise until such a time as you came back to explain your mangled analogy.........

I was simply pointing out the deficiencies in the grammar of your title, in much the same way as you attempted (erroneously, as it transpired) with mine earlier in the day.
-- answer removed --
AOG.....just a guess mind you......but when we hear to changes made to the NHS by the Coalition Government, then.......just a guess.........UNISON.
AOG - you and I have both fallen foul of the hidden pitfalls for 'written-only' communication which can mean that irony and humour are unintentionally lost and misunderstandings in tone and meaning do occure regularly.

It is inappropriate therefore to infer that anyone who has failed to understand your points is responsibile because of some inferred deficiency in intelligence on the readers' part, rather than the possibility that you failed to make your point clearly.

Perhaps you would like to address a response to me personally - something you have recently ceased to do, for reasons of which I am unaware.

Thank you.

21 to 40 of 89rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Whose next to march?

Answer Question >>