Donate SIGN UP

Home Insurance

Avatar Image
johnny37 | 13:33 Wed 10th Sep 2014 | Insurance
2 Answers
I have put a voluntary excess of zero. It does not cost much but I am wondering whether it should be higher on the grounds that in the event of a claim it will affect quotes for the next five years and wipe out any benefit.
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 2 of 2rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by johnny37. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I am sure claims history is important
but I am not in the industry so cant pontificate.

one of my houses has a buildings insurance only at £150

but my claims history is zero over twenty years.

Health insurance for example is really in the nature of a savings scheme as one is pretty well bound ot use it at some time

I am one of the people who only insure for rare catastrophes.

I work in insurance and I don't think that having an excess of say £150 is going to make much difference. Most people don't bother claiming for small losses so I would imagine that if you claim it is going to be for something quite costly. For instance if you make a claim for £1000, whether you have no excess or an excess of £150 isn't going to make much difference as far as the insurance company are concerned. They will still have paid out far more than you have paid them in premiums for the year. I wouldn't bother with a voluntary excess unless your primary concern is to keep your premium down. You might find that you do still have a compulsory excess anyway, and the voluntary excess is in addition to that.

1 to 2 of 2rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Home Insurance

Answer Question >>