Hurrah for Darnell.......
......for these two nuggets;
1 - To Mikey - if it wasn't for the fact you are blind you'd've been voted off by now.
2 - To Sarah - you only want Mikey to win because it makes you look good.
Both true.
Mikey is a nasty piece of work and thoroughly annoying, but because of his disability is likely to win.
I know I shouldn't give a monkey's, but I really really don't want this person to win.
Thoughts?
flip_flop Thurs 04/09/08 08:11
To subscribe to this question you need to
sign in to the AnswerBank or register
if you are not already a member. All you need is a valid email address to register.
|
|
faves at bookies are mikey 1st and rachel 2nd. I really dont want Mikey to win.
|
|
|
I do have a slight issue with Darnells comments, as always, in that he doesn't know that if Mikey wasn't blind, he may well have a different personality etc. However the bloke is blind and considering what he had to put up with between Nicole and Rex, I think he's done quite well and to be honest, its a bit hot coming from Darnell who is partially sighted and a complete neurotic mumbler.
|
|
|
oh yer get rid of darnell.
|
|
|
Darnell just too annonying dude.
Mikey just too disgusting.
Rachel just too goody two shoes.
Rex is an arrogant so&so but entertaining - he should come 2nd
Sara to win.
But, after all the slating of Kat's last night & eviction - I must say that in last night's episode she was at her funniest ever - when she was impersonating Darnell - **** off blah di blah - language she just did not use normally. It was priceless. She was more entertaining when she was impersonating someone else than when she was herself.
|
|
|
sarah jumped into bed with darnell again lastnight, she doesnt like him in that way and I have no time for teases. Rachel to win. Yes too nice but at least not nasty.
|
|
|
I really worry about the people who want Rex to win because he is 'entertaining'. Being obnoxious, bullying and passing continual snide remarks to fellow house mates is not entertainment. If Rex wins what sort of message does that send out to young, impressionable people ? Is this the sort of role model we want them to copy ? Surely bad behaviour should not be seen to be rewarded ?
I suspect that the other housemates have never encountered someone from Rex's background before and,with the exception of Mikey, are in awe of him. It seems to me, in this class-ridden society, those with money think they have a god-given right to rule, and those without accept their position and do as they are told. Rex might have money but he has absolutely no class. You don't need money to have class, you need manners and respect for others.Although she might be boring, Rachel has both these qualities.She has always remained gracious,even when under pressure from Rex's sniping. I find it impossible to believe that anyone could keep up an act with the constant baiting from Rex. She has never sworn at anyone ,said anything behind anyone's back and has had the patience of a saint with Mikey. Rachel had done her best in all the tasks and was, I think, a much better dancer than Nicole.
I suspect Rachel would be far more animated in familiar surroundings with people she knows.She was out of her depth surrounded by 'larger than life' people.I think you have to establish yourself in the first week of BB, and Rachel couldn't.
I love Mikey for standing up to Rex. I think he probably said what the rest of the housemates were thinking but did not have the guts to say.
Can't decide between Rachel or Mikey.
|
|
|
ok, Rex is an arrogant prat and a very clever wind-up merchant. Middle-class maybe, but the guy aint classy. Annoying & irritatingly smug, but not exactly badly behaved. Maybe he isn't an excellent role model to the impressionable young, but there are a lot worse out there believe you me.
I supose you're right about Rachel - she's sweet, genuinely nice & naive. But boring people don't get votes.
|
|
|
boring peoples dont get votes? lol she won!
|
|
Credit Cards | Swarovski | Loans | Free Credit Report | Magazine Subscriptions
