Donate SIGN UP

So Is It Now Its Racist To Do Impressions ?

Avatar Image
webbo3 | 10:19 Fri 07th Oct 2016 | News
14 Answers
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 14 of 14rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by webbo3. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
But surely, Ms Abbott is being caricatured because she is a politician, not because she is black?

Politicians or all stripes take satire in good humour - it goes with the job - and I am sure Ms Abbott is unlikely to be thin-skinned enough to be offended about the copying of her voice.

As for the colour of her skin - that doesn't come into it.

Jim Davidson doing 'Chalky' - racist (although of its time to be fair).

Jan Ravens doing 'Diane Abbott' - not racist.

I think that's pretty much summed it up.
Ridiculous reaction.
My mate does a brilliant impression of Stevie Wonder. He can sing like him too.
Jim Davidson doing 'Chalky' - racist (although of its time to be fair).


Chalky was fictional


A better comparison would have been Lenny Henry.
ummmm - //My mate does a brilliant impression of Stevie Wonder. He can sing like him too. //

I would suggest that your friend impersonates Stevie Wonder because he is a world-famous musician, and not because he happens to be black which, as with Ms Abbott - is an irrelevant detail.
Talbot - //Jim Davidson doing 'Chalky' - racist (although of its time to be fair).


Chalky was fictional //

True, but it was a caricature of a stereotypical black man.

// A better comparison would have been Lenny Henry. //

Possibly - although it's tricky for a black man to caricature a black man.

That does lead to the argument that 'It's not racist if black people do it ...' which is not an argument that I especially side with, but that's a separate debate.

My friend's black so impersonating SW is nothing to do with race.

(seen Stevie at Glastobury, absolutely brilliant)
ummmm - //My friend's black so impersonating SW is nothing to do with race. //

Personally, I don't think it would be do with race whatever your friend's ethnicity. But that is a subtlety that seems to have escaped the Corbynistas on this occasion.
she didn't even black up for it!
Lenny Henry would have been well snookered as an impressionist if he had to stick to just doing black people ...
.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0PeSdu7MUCw
A bit of a non story.
Half a dozen tweets from mostly anonymous sources is whipped up to a racism storm, when one doesn't exist. It is just making up a rubbish story from rubbish material.
This is precisely the sort of thing that exacerbates racism. Idiots!!
All part of the problem with the prolific use of tools of Beelzebub.
In the new age of internet democracy, everyone has a say. So it is not difficult to find stupid people tweeting rubbish.
In this instance, out of the millions who watched the programme, they have found half a dozen tweets and made up an anti-Corbyn story from it.

Do the opinions of this handful of loonies matter? - No.
Do these loonies have any influence? - No.
Do they fairly represent the opinions of the show's viewers? - No

To take this desperate waste of time garbage as real news is a mistake. To think it proves anything about Corbyn, black people, racism or the Labour Party is an insult to most people's intelligence. ^sadly, many are taken in by it.

1 to 14 of 14rss feed

Do you know the answer?

So Is It Now Its Racist To Do Impressions ?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.