Donate SIGN UP

court case

Avatar Image
jaycee401 | 22:28 Sun 12th Aug 2007 | Law
0 Answers
I am the respondant in a tribunal court case with my ex partner who is the applicant which is going to be heard in a months time. The property in question is now in my sole name after he transfered it to me, but he is now saying that he did not realise what the transfer entailed and he wants it 'set aside'. My barrister has now got my case ready and will be questioning my ex partner regarding his mortgage fraud, named as obtaining property by deception. My ex took out a mortgage in 2001 and did not declare on the application form that he already had a mortgage which was in arrears. He never declared this address on the form as he has not lived at the property for several years (he had it rented out for at least 8 years-and has never declared this either, so my barrister will also be bringing this up). He gave the address at the property he was living in at the time, which was he rented privatley so he was on the electoral roll there which satisfied the building society. = When he transfered the property to me I paid off his mortgage and took one out with another building society. What do you think will happen to him in court? I know it may seem really mean of my barrister to bring all this up but as he is trying to get my house off me I have no option but to dig the dirt up on him. Cheers
Gravatar

Answers

rss feed

Best Answer

Nobody has yet answered this question. Once some answers have been given, jaycee401 will be able to select one answer as the best. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
There are no answers available for this question.

rss feed

Do you know the answer?

court case

Answer Question >>