Week in hand

If someone works a week in hand on NMW and works for 10 years, do they get paid the weeks wages which would have been due 10 years ago or do they get the current rate for the job? If they got the rate from 10 years ago (and I know NMW wasn't used then, this is a rhetorical question) would that fall foul of the NMW regulations?
07:58 Fri 23rd May 2008
 
Best Answer


No best answer has yet been selected by thugulike. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.

1 to 4 of 4

A week in hand means that each week you get paid for the previous week so that when you leave that job you will be paid at your current rate for the hours worked the previous week plus the hours worked for your last week.
You've confused me her thugulike. I think you are misunderstanding the concept of a week in hand. I think it's quite starightforward unless I'm missing something.

Let's suppose you work for 10 years or 520 weeks):

In week 1 you get nothing ,
In week 2 you get paid for week 1
In week 3 you get paid for week 2
............................................................
In week 519 you get paid for week 518
In week 520 (your final week) you get paid for week 519
Then as you leave you get paid for week 520
Question Author
Thank you. I understand that to be case but in practice it doesn't seem to work like that. I appreciate your answers.
I think the previous answers are confusing a week in hand with a week in arrears. In a week in hand situation if you earn �400 in your first week this is retained by your employer and paid to you (less deductions) when you leave. So if you work there for ten years and your wages increase to �700 per week you will still only get �400 returned as your week in hand.
In a week in arrears what you earn in week one is paid to you in week two so when you leave your final pay packet would be two weeks at the current pay rate.
I doubt very much if the week in hand would fall foul of NMW legislation as I don't think it is retrospective.

1 to 4 of 4

Related Questions

Wednesday. Must remember to do the bins this morning. I forgot last week and had a mad rush when the bin lorry tuned up. just made it! :o} No frost again this morning. Long may it stay that way. i...
Good morning everyone from a considerably cooler HQ - we seem to have stopped melting for a little, but it all returns later in the week !! Unfortunately the bushfire is still burning in the Adelaide...
When we bought our first house 12yrs ago after living in married quarters for 30 + years we were quite naïve. We had a new kitchen fitted by large local company, hand made units etc, when the fitter...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-30366977 If Cleggie is saying this now, why was Danny Alexander sitting so close to Osborne this week in Parliament. Its seems that one LibDem hand doesn't know...
A teacher was asking her class to remember some difficult words that they had studied last week. "Now children, who can use the word "faculty" in a sentence?" Scruffy Tommy's hand flies up. The...
And one that is pretty much everyone's main concern: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30474521 You know they're really worried when they're sending out a document to the party faithful entitled...

Latest posts