Week in hand

If someone works a week in hand on NMW and works for 10 years, do they get paid the weeks wages which would have been due 10 years ago or do they get the current rate for the job? If they got the rate from 10 years ago (and I know NMW wasn't used then, this is a rhetorical question) would that fall foul of the NMW regulations?
07:58 Fri 23rd May 2008
 
Best Answer


No best answer has yet been selected by thugulike. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.

1 to 4 of 4

A week in hand means that each week you get paid for the previous week so that when you leave that job you will be paid at your current rate for the hours worked the previous week plus the hours worked for your last week.
You've confused me her thugulike. I think you are misunderstanding the concept of a week in hand. I think it's quite starightforward unless I'm missing something.

Let's suppose you work for 10 years or 520 weeks):

In week 1 you get nothing ,
In week 2 you get paid for week 1
In week 3 you get paid for week 2
............................................................
In week 519 you get paid for week 518
In week 520 (your final week) you get paid for week 519
Then as you leave you get paid for week 520
Question Author
Thank you. I understand that to be case but in practice it doesn't seem to work like that. I appreciate your answers.
I think the previous answers are confusing a week in hand with a week in arrears. In a week in hand situation if you earn �400 in your first week this is retained by your employer and paid to you (less deductions) when you leave. So if you work there for ten years and your wages increase to �700 per week you will still only get �400 returned as your week in hand.
In a week in arrears what you earn in week one is paid to you in week two so when you leave your final pay packet would be two weeks at the current pay rate.
I doubt very much if the week in hand would fall foul of NMW legislation as I don't think it is retrospective.

1 to 4 of 4

Related Questions

Hi Again, As my original bulletin disappeared I might repeat myself so bear with me and my memory. I think I mentioned the fiasco with the Arrythmic Nurse who told me my cardio version would have to...
Well and truly stuck this week. Can anyone give me a helping hand 10a The kind of psychological slip that upsets a friend about the middle of January (8) -r-u-i-- 7d Italian seafarers - see one...
Good evening all - yes it's that time in Ozland, in fact almost my bedtime and without the timely assistance of ECCLES I'd probably still be waiting for the links to come to hand ... However without...
My son was booked to go to Miami this summer. But he is wondering if it is a good idea. Some people at his work have told him it is dirty and dangerous with gun gangs roaming and apart from the main...
Must be thick! Struggled all week and still two unsolved! 11a Farm worker drinks kind of port (7) H _ _ _ A _ D (Farm worker must be hand surely/ 6d Vehicle fitted with ABS (6,3) M _ _ _ L _ / C _ R...
Ali accidentally overheard Alex having a conversation with David telling David that his pet cat is missing. Alex tells David that he's going to place a post on the notice board offering a reward of...

Latest posts