Week in hand

If someone works a week in hand on NMW and works for 10 years, do they get paid the weeks wages which would have been due 10 years ago or do they get the current rate for the job? If they got the rate from 10 years ago (and I know NMW wasn't used then, this is a rhetorical question) would that fall foul of the NMW regulations?
08:58 Fri 23rd May 2008
 
Best Answer


No best answer has yet been selected by thugulike. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.

1 to 4 of 4

A week in hand means that each week you get paid for the previous week so that when you leave that job you will be paid at your current rate for the hours worked the previous week plus the hours worked for your last week.
You've confused me her thugulike. I think you are misunderstanding the concept of a week in hand. I think it's quite starightforward unless I'm missing something.

Let's suppose you work for 10 years or 520 weeks):

In week 1 you get nothing ,
In week 2 you get paid for week 1
In week 3 you get paid for week 2
............................................................
In week 519 you get paid for week 518
In week 520 (your final week) you get paid for week 519
Then as you leave you get paid for week 520
Question Author
Thank you. I understand that to be case but in practice it doesn't seem to work like that. I appreciate your answers.
I think the previous answers are confusing a week in hand with a week in arrears. In a week in hand situation if you earn �400 in your first week this is retained by your employer and paid to you (less deductions) when you leave. So if you work there for ten years and your wages increase to �700 per week you will still only get �400 returned as your week in hand.
In a week in arrears what you earn in week one is paid to you in week two so when you leave your final pay packet would be two weeks at the current pay rate.
I doubt very much if the week in hand would fall foul of NMW legislation as I don't think it is retrospective.

1 to 4 of 4

Related Questions

Top right-hand corner defeating me. 10ac African city society rather strong to begin with(8) 12 ac Deal with popular policeman coming to blows (5-5) Sorry I haven't got any letters in. thanks in...
I am facing court because of my ex, for criminal damage and common assault. Late last year my ex told me that needed to be taught a lesson by being charged with something, I asked her why and what...
Three virgin sisters were all getting married within a short time period. Mum was a bit worried about how their sex life would get started and made them all promise to send a postcard from the...
I bought myself a second hand motor on Weds. Nothing too flash. I know the water levels were topped up when I left the garage (the chap checked these over with me). Since then I have done 140 miles....
Hi all. Badly stuck this week. Need a holiday. 1D A light blow with the open hand. C???. 2D. Intractable problem, hard case, ??????E. 12A. A serious crime. ??N???T??????. 11D Police lock-ups....
I work for a pet sitting/dog walking agency and I was given a new client last wk. Went and met family and dog. They explained that he was scared of other dogs as he had been attacked in the past and...

Latest posts