Donate SIGN UP
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 6 of 6rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by youngmafbog. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
He has not yet been charged with a crime, and it is overwhelmingly likely that he is being surveilled by the security services. Following this person's activities may (for all we know) provide an in for informers or other operatives into the recruitment network that will not stop existing in the UK if he is deported. These networks tend to be small and highly decentralised, so any "in" route is valuable for the intelligence services and their campaign to root out or neutralise them.

There. Speculative, sure. But rational nontheless.
Incidentally, I suspect the above reasons are precisely the same ones that former ISIS combatants are sometimes allowed back in to the UK. If the press is reporting x number of these people, it is the guaranteed minimum that our intelligence services know.

We have decent evidence that the services of other countries (namely Russia) are complicit in trafficking IS fighters to and from the middle east - this appears to be in the hope that these people can be channelled into dangerous warzones and reduce their risk to the country in question. I don't think it's unreasonable to assume that British and European intelligence agencies do something similar, but due to a lack of investigative reporting it has not been discovered. I also suspect that it is a more likely explanation for why these kinds of decisions are taken rather than.... whatever you think the explanation is. Yuman rites or whatever it is that is making you angry.
I don't think I should state my views on this Post YMB, I'd get banned.
Can someone give me a rational explanation of why he should be allowed to stay?

Because he is innocent.

For some unknown reason they have not charged him or prosecuted him in 21 years.
//Because he is innocent.// ??

//‘G’ arrived in Britain in August 1995 using a fake French passport.//

//He has lost two appeals against deportation but has used human rights laws to stay in the UK.//

//According to the Home Office he was an active supporter of the Algerian terror group Salafist Group for Call and Combat, which is allegedly linked to Bin Laden’s terrorist network.//

Yoo man rites innit. We give em to foreign migrants and illegals whilst taking them away from the prole indigenous.

So why has he not been found guilty of anything I wonder.? I am not sure there is an op an right not to be found guilty. Maybe it's incompetence. Maybe it's deliberate as Kroc suggests.

1 to 6 of 6rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Another Belter From The 'ooman Rights Mad Judges

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.