Would A Man Of British Heritage Have...
News1 min ago
Orgasmic Frenzy Of Multiple Posts From The Ab Hard Right Clique . .. .
24 Answers
,. . . over Starmer's honourable behaviour.
As expected.
As expected.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Canary42. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Well lets face it the hard left were on here in their droves banging on about cake (that wasnt eaten) so its only fair to mention Curry (that was). And where are they now.
But then your so far left you have disappeared up your jacksie.
Plus, from most comments of the 'Far right' most dont think Sir Kier should be prosecuted any more than they didnt think Johnson should. It's the left who have an obsession with FPN
But then your so far left you have disappeared up your jacksie.
Plus, from most comments of the 'Far right' most dont think Sir Kier should be prosecuted any more than they didnt think Johnson should. It's the left who have an obsession with FPN
How have you managed to come to the conclusion his behaviour is honourable?
1. He managed to drive himself into a dead end so really this was his only course of action.
2. Durham Constabulary have a stated policy of not issuing retrospective fines, and therefore it's pretty much a dead cert he won't be fined.
3. I note he refused to answer whether he would resign if Durham Constabulary confirm it was against the rules, but they will not issue an FPN as it would be retrospective.
4. Given he was calling for Johnson's resignation whilst Johnson was being investigated, if Starmer was truly honourable, as he's now being investigated he should resign - otherwise it's rank hypocrisy.
5. Starmer is a liar - for months it's been stated Raynor wasn't there, but when proof was provided that she most definitely was there, it then becomes a "genuine mistake".
6. Starmer is a liar - this was a beer and curry social after a day of work. I have zero problem with that, but don't take us all for mugs and insist work continued after the beer and curry social.
Like it loathe it, but kudos to The Daily Mail for exposing Starmer's lies.
Personally I don't think Starmer should be fined (or investigated for that matter), and I didn't think BJ should have been fined for not eating cake either - these are trivial matters - but for somebody who was so very very vocal about BJs non-eaten birthday cake, when the beer and curry social was worse, he really should have kept his trap shut.
Starmer has been far from honourable.
1. He managed to drive himself into a dead end so really this was his only course of action.
2. Durham Constabulary have a stated policy of not issuing retrospective fines, and therefore it's pretty much a dead cert he won't be fined.
3. I note he refused to answer whether he would resign if Durham Constabulary confirm it was against the rules, but they will not issue an FPN as it would be retrospective.
4. Given he was calling for Johnson's resignation whilst Johnson was being investigated, if Starmer was truly honourable, as he's now being investigated he should resign - otherwise it's rank hypocrisy.
5. Starmer is a liar - for months it's been stated Raynor wasn't there, but when proof was provided that she most definitely was there, it then becomes a "genuine mistake".
6. Starmer is a liar - this was a beer and curry social after a day of work. I have zero problem with that, but don't take us all for mugs and insist work continued after the beer and curry social.
Like it loathe it, but kudos to The Daily Mail for exposing Starmer's lies.
Personally I don't think Starmer should be fined (or investigated for that matter), and I didn't think BJ should have been fined for not eating cake either - these are trivial matters - but for somebody who was so very very vocal about BJs non-eaten birthday cake, when the beer and curry social was worse, he really should have kept his trap shut.
Starmer has been far from honourable.
// he (Keir) was also guilty of breaking the rules.//
oh dear no
he is saying he didnt break the rules
and if someone else ( the copper, the bizzies) say he did then he will resign.
FPN ( or fixed penalty notices) arent under the CPS are they?
Recent case ( Yesterday Times) High court gave a judgement over the Cousins vigil non event - - found the met had got its knickers in a knot over that one
admitting dear danny that he broke the rules means he says he knows he is need of an FPN
He is saying the opposite. Good example of Danny verballing an ex-DPP
oh dear no
he is saying he didnt break the rules
and if someone else ( the copper, the bizzies) say he did then he will resign.
FPN ( or fixed penalty notices) arent under the CPS are they?
Recent case ( Yesterday Times) High court gave a judgement over the Cousins vigil non event - - found the met had got its knickers in a knot over that one
admitting dear danny that he broke the rules means he says he knows he is need of an FPN
He is saying the opposite. Good example of Danny verballing an ex-DPP
youngmafbog
Well lets face it the hard left were on here in their droves banging on about cake (that wasnt eaten) so its only fair to mention Curry (that was). And where are they now.
But then your so far left you have disappeared up your jacksie.
Plus, from most comments of the 'Far right' most dont think Sir Kier should be prosecuted any more than they didnt think Johnson should. It's the left who have an obsession with FPN
Correction, the Far Right don’t want Starmer prosecuted because they realise the implications and increased pressure the besieged PM would come under.
I don’t know why they’re panicking so much, it’ll be last weeks chip wrappers when the next FPN and the Gray report land.
Well lets face it the hard left were on here in their droves banging on about cake (that wasnt eaten) so its only fair to mention Curry (that was). And where are they now.
But then your so far left you have disappeared up your jacksie.
Plus, from most comments of the 'Far right' most dont think Sir Kier should be prosecuted any more than they didnt think Johnson should. It's the left who have an obsession with FPN
Correction, the Far Right don’t want Starmer prosecuted because they realise the implications and increased pressure the besieged PM would come under.
I don’t know why they’re panicking so much, it’ll be last weeks chip wrappers when the next FPN and the Gray report land.
More honourable behaviour from Starmer.
https:/
https:/
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.