Donate SIGN UP
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 12 of 12rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Gromit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
The sentence? I agree.
Vile
Good.
Agree with sandyRoe,no excuse should have got 25yrs at least.
Seven years?

If he'd done that and killed a US child would he still have received that?

I think this shows us what value the American military puts on a foreigners life
In a war zone like Iraq or Afghanistan you regard everyone as your enemy. If the terrorists decided to wear some sort of uniform they could prevent the loss of civilian life.
Horrific i agree. But shouldn't we say the same when an insurgent plants a bomb, and kills not just allied soldiers, but their own men, women and children.
Yes, I agree em
I think, Jake, that the point is that he would not have killed an US child as he is not inherantly a murderer. The horrors that the forces in Afghan are subjected to on a daily basis means that they can see enemies everywhere and that they can get a warped sense of right and wrong. Whilst I am not condoning his actions in any way, anymore than I would condone any other such act, I think that the sentence is a fair one. He will have to live with the horror of what he has done as well as the shame and the dishonour of his unit for the rest of his life and I think that is punishment enough.
Question Author
BagpussAA,

I couldn't disagree with you more.
Lt Caley infamous for his part in the My Lai massacre served three and a half years 'house arrest'.
I doubt if shame or thoughts of the honour of his regiment weighed heavily on him.
Pile of scum,the lot of them.

1 to 12 of 12rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Sickening war crimes

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.