Donate SIGN UP
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 31rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by smurfchops. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Nope.
I wouldn't use the word excited.
My waters haven't broken yet.
NOPE!!

No.
No
Why would one be excited ?
Unless the Queen varies the letters patent issued by George V in 1917 this baby will not be royal.
I honestly didn't even know until now. I really ought to read the papers a little more often!
The word you're looking for is 'indifferent'.
Not in the slightest I'm afraid. Women have been having babies for such a long time now that its hardly something to get worked up about is it ?

Of course, Mary was a virgin but still had a baby....now that was really interesting ! Exciting even !
-- answer removed --
Not unless we get a day off work.
And the betting on the name for a girl is ?????
Not in the slightest.
Victoria.
Margo!
Not excited exactly but im looking forward to seeing what she has and if its a girl if it will be called Alice, as some people have speculated..
Ellie - believe it or not my married name (first time) was Queen!! The betting is on Diana.
Sharon or Karen. It's about time we had a royal with a chavvy name:-)

1 to 20 of 31rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

The Royal Baby

Answer Question >>