Donate SIGN UP

Fergie

Avatar Image
smurfchops | 23:35 Wed 23rd Nov 2016 | ChatterBank
19 Answers
Does this branch of The Firm have no shame? First Andy wants his gals to have free apartments at Kensington Palace, now Fergie is after £25 million from Rupert Murdoch.
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 19 of 19rss feed

Avatar Image
Cannot stand pompous Andy and his sponging daughters !
16:16 Thu 24th Nov 2016

Andrew is a Prince, that makes his daughters Princesses, why shouldn't they live in Kensington Palace?
They have no shame and can never have enough palaces to live in.
I'm not sure how many palaces in just London is enough.

Buy they are Princesses that makes them special. Coz they just are ...Coz they were born special...Coz their DNA is special ... Thus they are princesses and get special treatment as special humans.
If they are paying their way fair enough but the Yorks seem to want the privileges whilst enjoying freebie holidays, then Fergie puts not just a toe but her whole foot in it trying to make deals with a fake sheik to meet the Royal Duke Andrew, the fact remains had he not been been a fake sheik she would have got away with it. She has a nerve trying to sue for that.
I read Charles is downsizing the Royal family appearances Andrew is miffed because his Princesses have no Royal protection, and little to do. Beatrice needs to find a job.
Sometimes anti royalty posts are not well received on AB :-) :-).
and sometimes not

Anne was determined her kids would have to make their own way in the world she refused titles for them.

Randy Andy didnt - and yeah Princesses Eguenie and Beatrice need to get their combined asses into gear and get a job.

and if Princess Ferge can get £25m out of Murdock then good on her ! as an Oz might say
The older generation were taught not to question their betters and to always show respect to the royal family.
The younger generation either question what is the point of them ?
Or find them entertaining via scandals etc in the press, true or made up.
Personally I think we should find a different mascot for the uk.
PeterP, I was told on a similar thread to this a while ago that Zara and Peter were not automatically entitled; the titles have to come from the male line. I don't know if that is true, and I can't remember who posted it.

I think Bea and Eug should take a few jobs from the queen and give her a bit of a rest, but who'd want to meet those two?
Some folk take the whole divine right thing too far.
This thread will probably not be here soon.
I think whoever has the power to remove threads is a royalist.
Off with his thread! :)
on the contrary, a similar thread has been here for a week

http://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/News/Question1523652.html
I'm not sure how Sarah suing Murdoch has any effect on anyone else.

Princesses live at the Palace, sounds right in the scheme of things to me.
Regarding female titles,and who uses them...this from wiki:

// She and her sister are the only granddaughters of the Queen to use the title of Princess of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the style Her Royal Highness: their cousin, Lady Louise Windsor, is styled as the daughter of an earl at the request of her parents; their other female first cousin, Zara Phillips, is the Queen's granddaughter through the female line, therefore allowing her only the title and style of her father, who has none. //
// PeterP, I was told on a similar thread to this a while ago that Zara and Peter were not automatically entitled;//

muhdarm is completely correct of course
I dont now go for absolute accuracy as it takes too much effort for no reward at all and anyway the automatic answer from standard Aber is on the level of " Princess oo-who-ee ? who she den ? " that I am often deluged with

Not every prince begets a prince (Baldric) they have to be sons of the sovereign - and not every grandchild ( of the sovereign) gets one. Geroge V who was not a great friend of the Tsar - he thought he had brought it on himself - also thought in Russia there were too many princes and grand dukes screwing actresses and limited the proliferation of the title in the UK.

I still think led gurlz ( eugenie and beatrice ) should get out and work
ley gurlz ..... lay gurlz
sozza - thinking too much of Les Dawson ....
and we never had a king geroge
oh dear

the wiki neglects to say the Queen is the font of all titles and can style her kids and their offspring as she wishes. ( Jowett's opinion 1952) At the time the font of all truth ( Daily Mail in case no one recognised it ) said that R Andy had secured titles for the daughters whereas Anne who was offered said no.



Those who need surnames should use Mountbatten Windsor but so far everyone has used Windsor ( Freddy Windsor etc )


Jowett as a QC gave ( for moolah ) an opinion to the Duke of Windsor that after he abdicated he went back to what he was - a prince of the realm and as such his wife should be .... HRH
then when he became Lord Chancellor (!) the Duke came knocking .....
and he came out with the second opinion above .....
Cannot stand pompous Andy and his sponging daughters !
Although the rules were laid down by George V in 1917 they can be varied. At their births both Prince Charles and Princess Anne were not entitled to royal status but George VI varied this. The same happened when Prince William got married; under the rules only his eldest son would be styled prince but the Queen changed this to include all his children.

1 to 19 of 19rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Fergie

Answer Question >>