Probably goes to the next of kin according to the rules f inheritance..... I don't think you are allowed to profit from your crime.... having said that he will be out eventually.
If he eventually got the house he'd be profiting from a crime. It should be disposed of as though the victim hadn't written a will with he son excluded
That seems fair enough. I think one can reasonably assume that the murdered individual would have had second thoughts about leaving their murderer anything were they in a position to change the will afterwards.
Maybe they should get the ouija board out to check.
On the subject of Jeremy Bamber he made great claims to being intelligent but, by any definition, was a total ass making regular appeals just to pander to his own sad little ego.
I had got up to the bit that the convict is treated as having predeceased the testator but couldnt work out if the heirs could be at will ( so that the murderer could indirectly inherit or whether it had to be under the laws of intestacy - oops when the children could ... )