EDDIE51 - “... But due to the 'electoral college' system Trump got in!...”
This would be the electoral college system that was introduced by the very far thinking and rational founding fathers of America who understood the need for the President to appeal to a wide ranging and geographically diverse range of voters and not just to large population centres that are (generall speaking) geographically small. There is cross party agreement in the USA that this is the least worst system for presidential elections.
If this were not the case and the electoral college system was widely considered to be unfair, it would have been changed decades ago. The fact that it was not just goes to show that both Democrats and Republicans consider it to be the best system they can conceive within which to conduct their political affairs.
I find it laughable that those on the (far?) left are now crying foul that the Republicans have won this particular election and are adopting a scorched earth policy with regards to the reasons why Hillary lost to Trump. Their reasons are many and varied and include (but are not limited to) the “unfair” electoral college system, her status as a female, Trump's “unfair” criticism of her demonstrably illegal activities, etc. The list of different reasons I've read run into double figures. It's pathetic, cry babyish nonsense. The fact is, Hillary was a terrible candidate; mired in allegations of corruption, money laundering and destruction of federal evidence, etc. The fact that she lost against the odious Trump just does to show what an appalling presidential candidate she was and what a shambles the DEC is at the moment – mirroring our very own slow car-crash that is the Labour party.
However, I digress. The Democrats have been loath to change the electoral college system because it works for them as much as it works for the Republicans – just as the founding fathers intended.