|
|||||
|
Question Author
apologies, I meant Extradite!
|
|
yes they can
|
|
This isn't a new story, but he's alleged to have broken US law from within this country, by undertaking on-line activities.
Btw We're a sovereign country too, US isn't surely, they don't have a sovereign? |
|
Yes they can extradite people from Britian for petty crimes that have never set foot on US soil- because our disgusting Govt cowtows to anything and everything America desires, because apparently we have a ' special relationship'- slightly like a warlord and his camp follower from what I can see of it.
|
|
ps this is not new, Ever heard of the natwest 3?
|
|
Question Author
point taken, just not quite how they perceive themselves now that they don't have the Bush guy....he seemed to always think of himself as a bit of a King (queen?)...
But we can't do the same thing to the yanks? Hardly sounds like a fair cricket match. |
|
Question Author
Yes, I remember them quite well. But I excluded them from my thought in this instance as they had travelled to the states quite a few times and if I remember correctly, one of them even lived there for a brief period.
|
|
however, they were extradited despite the fact what they did was in britain and broke no british laws
|
|
Question Author
sorry..can't get the fingers to work this morning... I meant to say, just not quite sure how....
|
|
I think I heard that the extradition arrangements we have with the USA were to be reviewed by our Government in the light of the absurdly biased balance of evidence required for a British person to be extradited to the USA in contrast to the vice-versa situation. BTW anyone know how the Garry McKinnon situation stands a the the moment ?
|
|
Question Author
What caught my attention most was the news reader commented that whilst the americans can extradite in this manner, we cannot. That's what raised my eyebrows most of all. I hope that isn't true, but perhaps it is. It was also mentioned that this agreement materialised in the midst of the Iraq situation and was meant to expedite the movement of potential terrorists into the american's hands. To me, that's where it all becomes so opaque as I thought both they and we were simply doing this anyway as part of the 'rendering' process no one acknowledged. I'm just too naive I suppose.
|
|
we can extradite Americans, largely we have chosen not too.
|
|
read this - summarises the process in the 2003 Treaty
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-16041824 |
|
Question Author
That was very interesting, thank you Crosswordfan!
|
|
He gave people the means and the location to where illegal links were hosted.
It's a bit like you setting up a website where others link to the selling of class A drugs or guns etc. You may not be hosting the product but you are hosting the link and the means to get that product by others. My first question to him would be 'what purpose was your website set up for?' |
|
The evil prosecutors in the U.S. and the evil officials in the U.K. who conspired to have him extradited chose their professions so they could do harm upon society.
|
0 min ago
ChatterBank
5 mins ago
Jokes
In History Who Would You Most Like To...
6 mins ago
History
8 mins ago
Jokes
16 mins ago
ChatterBank
How To Increase The Exposure Of My...
18 mins ago
Business