Donate SIGN UP

Kate Middleton - Again

Avatar Image
flip_flop | 07:15 Sat 15th Sep 2012 | News
60 Answers
Am I missing something here?

The world has seen Kate Middleton's breasts.

So what.

They are just a pair of tits - its not as though the photos are of her bottomless with legs akimbo.

I can, a bit, understand the privacy argument, but the reports all seem to be more concerned with the fact her breasts have been seen and not the invasion of privacy (incidentally, if I understand correctly, it would be perfectly legal for me to walk along a beach taking photos of whoever I liked.........so what is the difference here?).

It was a pretty scummy thing to do, but the bruhaha that has ensued is ridiculous.
Gravatar

Answers

41 to 60 of 60rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by flip_flop. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I agree with you em10, what they do in private is their business.
must make sure I close the curtains tonight and not frighten the natives
Middleton Flyer dead heated in 5.25 at Newcastle.if we hadda known we cudda left the bookies bust so to speak.
I feel more sorry for her as the days go on. If the royal family doesn't support and protect her, she will be another Diana.
One thing that she has going in her favour is that she has a lot more brains to think all of this through and manage it, and she is that much older than Diana.
tony, do you have your cameras at the ready, looks like we have an expedition to Northern Ireland to "visit" Sibbo's place and publish the pics here!
perhaps, but if you were being followed by these idiots round the clock, snapping away at you till you can't breathe, wouldn't you fall off a bit. I also don't think Diana was stupid, she was just too young to have dealt with all that nonsense, adding a stupid husband who seemed more intent on getting his end away with his mistress.
I really don' t give a flying one about this - for tits to be of any particular interest to me they need to be attached to a flesh and blood person - not just a grainy (presumably - I can't be arsed to look for the pictures) long-lens pap snap.

To refute (at least in my case) daffy's assertion - I don't give a stuff about size - it's the person behind them that is the turn-on ...
\\\\- it's the person behind them that is the turn-on ...\\\

"Can't find a character to denote ...nervous cough"
I agree with dave on this - actually I have a preference for smaller boobs on a woman; they tend to be more sensitive. However, ultimately, good sex is in the brains - of both you and your partner.
\\\ ultimately, good sex is in the brains - of both you and your partner.\\

"Can't find character for....explosive cough"
I have sensitive breasts and they're not small so I break your stereotyping!
where's the camera?
Miss C.........not stereotyping...just generalising...........;-)
Why the hell did she have her top off?
Take 500mls ibuprofen and have a lie down in a darkened room, Sqad
sibby.....LOL....500mls........that half a litre!
Sqad! Behave now. Ladies...I think the guys are on a fishing trip. By the time this has died down we'll all have disclosed the size and sensitivity of our boobs. x
that will cure anything.....probably even make Kate's boobs inflate as well.
oops 200mg
Question Author
"If the royal family doesn't support and protect her, she will be another Diana."

If she stays married to the future King, I don't really see that happening, but if she doesn't and starts shagging an Egyptian and is driven at high speed by a drunk man, then possibly.

41 to 60 of 60rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3

Do you know the answer?

Kate Middleton - Again

Answer Question >>