Donate SIGN UP

One For The Atheists:

Avatar Image
keyplus90 | 09:38 Wed 08th Aug 2012 | Religion & Spirituality
36 Answers
In case anyone's interested where I'm coming from..........

http://d1.islamhouse....he_red_underpants.pdf
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 36 of 36rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by keyplus90. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
VE //What does it tell us about the moral compass of //

May I add another?

(d) anyone who finds that acceptable?
I was hoping it was just the three of them, Naomi.
Your moral compass on religion . . .

http://www.religifake...ligion-1342666827.jpg

. . . any questions?
VE //What does it tell us about the moral compass of //
It needs re-magnetizing
Keyplus , it is obvious from your posts that the koran does not forbid dishonesty, deceit and self delusion.
jake said; "In my book Budhism is still a religion as they believe in irrational concepts without basis like the soul and reincarnation"
Is the implication here that is is solely through, what you consider to be 'irrational concepts', that Buddhism may qualify as a religion?
Jom - “... Keyplus , it is obvious from your posts that the koran does not forbid dishonesty, deceit...”

Indeed it does not. In point of fact, Islamic teachings actively condone telling lies to those who do not follow Allah. I find it amusing when I hear Islamic scholars (and blinkered Islamic adherents) talking about the concepts of truth and honesty. It's amusing because in Islam, those two words have different meanings depending on the beliefs of those participating in debate. In Islam, if two Muslims are talking, their religion quite rightly instructs them to be honest and truthful with one another. However, Islamic teachings specifically permit and condone the practise of dishonesty when a Muslim is talking to a non-Muslim. If proof were needed of this fact, the two Channel 4 documentaries called, “Undercover Mosque” and “Undercover Mosque – The Return” (both available on YouTube) demonstrate this to a quite alarming degree.

As if we needed further proof of the dishonesty of certain members of the Islamic faith, we have Keyplus whose personal record for telling the truth leaves much to be desired. He's just simply carrying out his blinkered religious duty with his usual blind enthusiasm.

Feel free to 'ignore' this post Keyplus as I'm sure you will. It wasn't intended for you anyway.
vetuste_ennemi - “... 'The truth was clear to them, yet they chose to ignore it, and so an awful fate awaits them, the fire of hell, where people will be roasted and burned yet will not die, but continue to suffer eternally...'. This is a verbatim quotation from the Man in Red Underpants. What does it tell us about the moral compass of: (a) Its author?; (b) The person who recommended the book?; (c) The god they worship?...”

What it tells me is that the author is deluded and rather sick minded. That's his business. No one has to read his rubbish and take it seriously... Except for Keyplus it would appear. He seems think that this is an example of 'where he's coming from'. I'm sure it is. It would therefore seem that Keyplus is coming from the standpoint of a vindictive, violent and intolerant person.

Is anyone surprised by this?

I very much doubt it since Keyplus has demonstrated time and time again that he is not a very pleasant person and that he considers those who disagree with him to be beneath contempt.
page 4.. how do we know the colour of the underpants?
page 5...Logic failure, no point in reading further
Try to be more objective keyplus, I detect a slight bias in your reasoning.
-- answer removed --
Question Author
He did say right in the beginning,

"I am pretty sure you are not going to like this..................

And few posts have proved that right.

Thanks to all of you who decided to start reading it and then stopped immediately. even that was as expected. And I have nothing more to say. about other posts and ideas here as they have been dealt with many times before.
But not by you Keyplus..
Hold on Keyplus! I've not stopped reading it. I've been rather busy lately and currently I'm not at home - but with highlighter pen in hand, and several areas of the author's wonky logic already marked, I am ploughing through it. I have to say the Hunger Games trilogy is grabbing my attention rather more than your man's deliberations - far more believable - but I shall read your offering to the end.
The logic doesn't improve, Naomi, and it repeats some of the well-known lies about the accuracy of the Koran's description of embryology, adding a few sillier "proofs" of its divine inspiration. The author's (another Mossad invention) explanation of why the transcendental creator wants his creatures grovelling on their bellies five times a day is particularly amusing.
I meant to add a question mark after the word invention. Sadly these sneering enemies of civilisation are only too real and numerous.

21 to 36 of 36rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Do you know the answer?

One For The Atheists:

Answer Question >>