1) 'what evidence do you guys have that the prosecution didn't show to the jury then?'
2) The money was given to Redknapp by Mandric after they had a an argument about money due in a transfer, it was in every form of media, Harry was unhappy and the very rich Mandrich(sic) put money into Harrys account from his own accounts from abroad the money was never in this country and was never seen as payment. He stated he wanted to show Harry how to invest.
3) Both of these guys are seriously rich given how much tax they pay why would the avoid tax on "just" £189k The prosecution were repeatedly asked this nad they had no answer (bbc)
Seems my post attracted a lot of barrack-room lawyers.He was found not guilty
by a jury,you cannot say much against that.Unless of course you were present,on each day of trial and able to form your opinion.
Thankyou JTH and Davethedog for your positive comments.
Unfortunately cannot name you both as best answer,so hope you will share it.
Regards dg