Donate SIGN UP

RBS excessive bonuses

Avatar Image
Gromit | 16:11 Thu 03rd Dec 2009 | News
22 Answers
October 2008, RBS takes £37 billion of taxpayer money to survive.

January 2009, RBS reveal a loss of £28 billion, the biggest ever annual loss in UK corporate history

November 2009, Government increases its stake taking taxpayers ownership of RBS to 80%.

November 2009, RBS board wants to award £1.5billion in bonuses this year.

http://business.times...ce/article6941746.ece

Should RBS be allowed to run the bank as they wish?

or Should the Government as the largest shareholder Veto excessive bonuses?
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 22 of 22rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Gromit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Just answer one question - why should they get a bonus for just doing their job ? Do our troops in Afghanistan get a bonus - no. Do nurses get a bonus - no. Do Firemen get a bonus - no. The list is endless. I rest my case !!!
FBG40 (Obviously this argument will not go down well with everybody, but that's life - hey ho !)
If they're threatening to walk if they don't get their bonuses, it seems to imply that they don't have legal recourse to obtain their ill-gotten gains (or surely they'd use the courts?). Let 'em walk - they screwed up in their jobs, why should they get rewarded for it?

If any other bank is looking to pay millions for someone whose decision-making could run them into the ground, I may be able to help them out...

21 to 22 of 22rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Do you know the answer?

RBS excessive bonuses

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.