Crosswords1 min ago
Another belter from the religion of peace.....
Apparently, some UK mad mullah has declared that the terrorist attrocity in Bombay is all the fault of the British, right oh! When are we going to come up with some sort of solution to the Islam problem? We keep leaving it and leaving at it just get's worse, is it time to get tough?
And of course the silence from the so called "Moderate" Muslims is deafening as usual. Are there any Muslims that don't at least secretly back these attacks?
And of course the silence from the so called "Moderate" Muslims is deafening as usual. Are there any Muslims that don't at least secretly back these attacks?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by MrsT. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
And in a vile rant he said any Brits killed had only themselves to blame for being on the �battlefield� in the war Muslims nuts are waging against the world.
That's from your quote Ali Gromit, looks like he's saying the Brits had themselves to blame. I realise there may be further semantics here, but hey comon, it's a bit like saying "it's your own fault" isn't it??
That's from your quote Ali Gromit, looks like he's saying the Brits had themselves to blame. I realise there may be further semantics here, but hey comon, it's a bit like saying "it's your own fault" isn't it??
Right, it's a slow afternoon so I can finally get round to condemning all of the things that have been comitted by British people such as myself this week. It's obviously highly important that I do this so that people don't suspect that I condone it in any way.
Shannon abduction - bad. don't think they should have done it. Officially condemned
Baby P - likewise. I'd like to state that this is not how the vast majority of British people behave, and these people do not represent my beliefs.
Come on Muslims, I'm 2 up on you and it's only 4.15pm.
Shannon abduction - bad. don't think they should have done it. Officially condemned
Baby P - likewise. I'd like to state that this is not how the vast majority of British people behave, and these people do not represent my beliefs.
Come on Muslims, I'm 2 up on you and it's only 4.15pm.
Mrs T
Sorry it's taken to long to get back to your eloquently ascribed rant, but I had to go into A&E to get my head removed from my a*se (thank you for the tip actually...I'd wondered why things sounded so muffled).
Anyway, to answer your points -
err because if you got your head out of your ar5e occasionally you'd notice that Islamic terrorism is in the news
Which is why I asked why you're asking us when are 'we' going to do something about it.
It's of no use to get onto a website and pose rhetorical questions. If you want change, get off your butt and do something. I've marched against proposed (and implemented) laws that I don't agree with. I've funded lobby groups.
Stop being lazy.
idle optimism I guess, people do sometimes have ideas you know
Lead by example - let's hear yours!
OK, about a billion sub human slime wanting to kill us because we disagree with them
Really?
Did you know there are only 1.2billion Muslims in the world
Are you saying that the vast majority are sub-human slime who want to kill us? Seriously?
When people use language like that, I assume they have learning difficulties. Do you?
OK I can do grammer lessons too. It was to indicate that the adjective:Moderate, was not my own
Strewth...this wasn't a <ahem> grammer (or indeed grammar) question. It was a question of intent. By putting 'moderate' in quotes, you imply that they aren't moderate.
But then you go on to say that there's no such thing as a moderate Muslim.
That in itself answers my question about your learning difficulties, because you have to be, as my mother used to say 'special' to say something like that.
Really, really special.
Enjoy your weekend...won'
Sorry it's taken to long to get back to your eloquently ascribed rant, but I had to go into A&E to get my head removed from my a*se (thank you for the tip actually...I'd wondered why things sounded so muffled).
Anyway, to answer your points -
err because if you got your head out of your ar5e occasionally you'd notice that Islamic terrorism is in the news
Which is why I asked why you're asking us when are 'we' going to do something about it.
It's of no use to get onto a website and pose rhetorical questions. If you want change, get off your butt and do something. I've marched against proposed (and implemented) laws that I don't agree with. I've funded lobby groups.
Stop being lazy.
idle optimism I guess, people do sometimes have ideas you know
Lead by example - let's hear yours!
OK, about a billion sub human slime wanting to kill us because we disagree with them
Really?
Did you know there are only 1.2billion Muslims in the world
Are you saying that the vast majority are sub-human slime who want to kill us? Seriously?
When people use language like that, I assume they have learning difficulties. Do you?
OK I can do grammer lessons too. It was to indicate that the adjective:Moderate, was not my own
Strewth...this wasn't a <ahem> grammer (or indeed grammar) question. It was a question of intent. By putting 'moderate' in quotes, you imply that they aren't moderate.
But then you go on to say that there's no such thing as a moderate Muslim.
That in itself answers my question about your learning difficulties, because you have to be, as my mother used to say 'special' to say something like that.
Really, really special.
Enjoy your weekend...won'
Davethedog
Fri 28/11/08
12:02 But the point is that when these things happen they never condem them do they?
Until Muslims come out and condem these atrocities it looks like acceptance doesn't it?
I am sure we have been down this road before. I do not represent all the Muslims but being a Muslim in bold words.
I condemn any sort of innocent killing, any where, by any one, individual or state, who ever, however.
Did I miss anything?
Now can anyone just repeat my words please if you agree with these, especially R1Geezer.
Fri 28/11/08
12:02 But the point is that when these things happen they never condem them do they?
Until Muslims come out and condem these atrocities it looks like acceptance doesn't it?
I am sure we have been down this road before. I do not represent all the Muslims but being a Muslim in bold words.
I condemn any sort of innocent killing, any where, by any one, individual or state, who ever, however.
Did I miss anything?
Now can anyone just repeat my words please if you agree with these, especially R1Geezer.
well done Keyplus, I accept your sincere condemnation of innocent killiing, well done. The next step is therefore toward atheism clearly Islam is not the religion for you, their track record speaks for itself, they kill innocents indescriminatley, unless of course your definition of "Innocent" is the Islamic one, ie non infidels. Or are you prepared to continue with a religion that so regularly opposes your personal views?
I loved Mani Hussain�s post that stated that The Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) said that �...The very meaning of the word 'Islam' is peace.�
Actually this is a lie. The meaning of Islam is �submission� or the total surrender of oneself to God.
It does NOT mean �peace�.
And this blatant lie from the �... the UK's biggest Muslim organization with over 500 affiliated national, regional and local groups, mosques, charities and schools...�
Why does anyone believe anything is self appointed, Muslim pressure group says?
Actually this is a lie. The meaning of Islam is �submission� or the total surrender of oneself to God.
It does NOT mean �peace�.
And this blatant lie from the �... the UK's biggest Muslim organization with over 500 affiliated national, regional and local groups, mosques, charities and schools...�
Why does anyone believe anything is self appointed, Muslim pressure group says?
Geezer I will take that you are condemning all what I am condemning. And I am sure I am not talking about only innocent Muslims.
Or are you selective even when it comes to condemnation and doing what you are blaming me for.
As long as terrorist attacks are concerned then Pakistan was blamed even for the attacks where (in service) Indian army officer and Co were involved. So blaming Pakistan is Indian habit and they don�t even let the dust settle.
http://www.ndtv.com/convergence/ndtv/story.asp x?id=NEWEN20080072662&ch=633623951227986250
http://www.ndtv.com/convergence/ndtv/story.asp x?id=NEWEN20080072662&ch=633623897943456085
Or are you selective even when it comes to condemnation and doing what you are blaming me for.
As long as terrorist attacks are concerned then Pakistan was blamed even for the attacks where (in service) Indian army officer and Co were involved. So blaming Pakistan is Indian habit and they don�t even let the dust settle.
http://www.ndtv.com/convergence/ndtv/story.asp x?id=NEWEN20080072662&ch=633623951227986250
http://www.ndtv.com/convergence/ndtv/story.asp x?id=NEWEN20080072662&ch=633623897943456085
Why is it always Muslims? I can�t remember reading anything in recent history where Christian fundamentalists assaulted a building and killed people. I don�t remember ever reading about a group of Hindu fundamentalists killing innocent people. In fact, I don�t remember reading anything in recent history where a group of fundamentalists from any of the world�s major religions have deliberately targeted innocent civilians � except the Muslim fundamentalists.
There seems to be a real problem with the Muslim way of thinking. Could it be that the holy book that Muslims believe is the literal word of God, is absolutely filled with death, murder and mutilation? The death, murder and mutilation in questions often being committed by or under the direct authority of Islam�s number one prophet, Mohammed.
Muslims try to emulate Mohammed in every aspect of their lives. They do this because Mohammed told them to in the Koran.
Muslims believe that the Koran is the literal word of God. Why? Because it says in the Koran, that the Koran is the literal word of God. And Muslims apparently don�t see the obvious logical flaw in this reasoning.
Seeing as Muslims seem to have a real problem with logic and reasoning, is it really any surprise that some Muslims turn out to be murderous, vile and wretched creatures themselves? They are imitating Mohammed. And they are very, very good at it. He�d be proud.
�But Mohammed, some of your followers are insane, warped, murdering, lunatics!�
�Yes. That�s my boys!�
There seems to be a real problem with the Muslim way of thinking. Could it be that the holy book that Muslims believe is the literal word of God, is absolutely filled with death, murder and mutilation? The death, murder and mutilation in questions often being committed by or under the direct authority of Islam�s number one prophet, Mohammed.
Muslims try to emulate Mohammed in every aspect of their lives. They do this because Mohammed told them to in the Koran.
Muslims believe that the Koran is the literal word of God. Why? Because it says in the Koran, that the Koran is the literal word of God. And Muslims apparently don�t see the obvious logical flaw in this reasoning.
Seeing as Muslims seem to have a real problem with logic and reasoning, is it really any surprise that some Muslims turn out to be murderous, vile and wretched creatures themselves? They are imitating Mohammed. And they are very, very good at it. He�d be proud.
�But Mohammed, some of your followers are insane, warped, murdering, lunatics!�
�Yes. That�s my boys!�
MrsT
I deliberately did not answer your question until I was able to read the report you referred to. When I was able to read it, it was clear you had misrepresented what was said, or you deliberately twisted it to say something that was never said, or ( after your lame answer above) you are too dim as to comprehended the meaning of what was actually said.
For exposing your dishonesty you label me "Ali Gromit". I assume that is meant as a slur. This depite having clearly stated the cleric in question is fanatical and evil.
This whole thread is based on a lie. If your case is so step g, why do you have to resort to telling porkies and branishing childish insults?
I deliberately did not answer your question until I was able to read the report you referred to. When I was able to read it, it was clear you had misrepresented what was said, or you deliberately twisted it to say something that was never said, or ( after your lame answer above) you are too dim as to comprehended the meaning of what was actually said.
For exposing your dishonesty you label me "Ali Gromit". I assume that is meant as a slur. This depite having clearly stated the cleric in question is fanatical and evil.
This whole thread is based on a lie. If your case is so step g, why do you have to resort to telling porkies and branishing childish insults?
( after your lame answer above) you are too dim as to comprehended the meaning of what was actually said.
why do you have to resort to telling porkies and branishing childish insults?
'Brandishing childish insults'? 'lame answer', and 'too dim to comprehend'
Tut, Tut, Gromit, a case of one calling the kettle black.
why do you have to resort to telling porkies and branishing childish insults?
'Brandishing childish insults'? 'lame answer', and 'too dim to comprehend'
Tut, Tut, Gromit, a case of one calling the kettle black.
Latest Posts
Crosswords3 mins ago
Sweetcorn In A Bag Of Mixed Veg
Food & Drink12 mins ago
ChatterBank13 mins ago
