Donate SIGN UP

Flooding

Avatar Image
Segilla | 17:30 Wed 23rd Jan 2008 | Law
5 Answers
Could someone comment on the effect of the famous Rylands v Fletcher decision [a person is liable for damage caused by escape of substances etc from his land], and widespread flooding.
Difficult as it may be for a landowner to stop the effects of inundation of his land, where the water then causes damage to his neighbour's land / property, is this actionable?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 5 of 5rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Segilla. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Someone could LOL. Do you want to know for purely academic reasons or are you concerned about a real situation? If the latter, what are the circumstances?
Question Author
This no theoretical problem.
Canal towpath renovation is being nullified by parts being washed away after heavy rains. The water originates from man-made lakes, overflows onto a public footpath, runs down a`short lane, probaby in private ownership, then across the towpath into the canal.
.
how can you blame someone for what is a natural cycle of nature. when private property/ownership is theft
Question Author
This a legal matter not a political probem, fletcher,5
Whose are the man made lakes?

1 to 5 of 5rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Flooding

Answer Question >>