Donate SIGN UP

Arguments

Avatar Image
nursecarla | 21:27 Sat 05th May 2007 | Body & Soul
12 Answers
When was the last time you had a full scale argument? who with, and why? and is it weak to back down just to stop the arguing? xxxxxxxxxxx
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 12 of 12rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by nursecarla. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
It is never weak to accept that you are wrong and apologise, if you cannot win the argument its better to agree to disagree!!

Arguing is generally a pointless exercise yet most of do it to some degree!!
I forgot to mention my last full scale argument was with an Ex g/f about 3 years ago.
About a fortnight ago.Wirh an ex.Dont backdown just for peace.Stick to your guns if youre right and others are being sneakey or underhand then dont let them away with it.No way jose .lol
i agree with you legend, although i don't like arguing. i stay away from them.
About six weeks ago with my ex. Never back down if you're right! I was right and only backed down when a lovely policeman called Nick came to my rescue lol
Not too long ago........
Well, once you have proven your point, the argument is pretty much over. If the other person still doesn't 'get it', tough.
I had a full scale blown argument with my dog last night I tried to get her chewey stick of her and she kept barking at me and I told her to fruck orf I am hungry and she then started to chew my leg so I eventually had to give redhead her chewy stick back
I dont have arguments...except on here....xxx
Oh good. are we going to have a big barney?

What's todays topic?
Arguments are based on logic and reasoning. However,
logic has its limitation.

In the 1930s, Austrian mathematician Godel proved
a theorem which became the "Godel theorem" in
cognition theory. It states that any formalized
'logical' system in principle cannot be complete
in itself. It means that a statement can always be
found that can be neither disproved nor proved
using the means of that particular system. To
discuss about such a statement, one must go beyond
that very logic system; otherwise nothing but a
vicious circle will result. Psychologist say that
any experience is contingent - it's opposite is
logically possible and hence should not be treated
as contradictory.

No he didn't.
I don't argue, I walk away. I like peace.

1 to 12 of 12rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Arguments

Answer Question >>