Extinction Rebellion Breaking Into Airfield.

[webbo3]

https://twitter.com/XrSouthEastUK/status/1444205302971252737

https://twitter.com/XrSouthEastUK/status/1444191051921690629

Breaking into an airfield, in the light of 9-11 surely these morons should be arrested under the terrorism act.

[ToraToraTora]

"reaking into an airfield, in the light of 9-11 surely these morons should be arrested under the terrorism act. " - err no they should be machine gunned on sight.

[sevenOP]

The proof is chronologically in front of her too....

Q:naomi"SevenOP, are you for real?"
Ans SevenOme :"naomi: "SevenOP, are you for real?"

Is that an ontological question, and if not, and I have interacted with you before on numerous occasions and answered every question you have ever asked me - a behaviour which you have not reciprocated -, what is the context of your question "are you for real?" ?

naomi ( ironically oblivious!????):~~"SevenOP, Incredulous at your blasé attitude towards security.

Which of your questions haven’t I answered?" @12:49 Sun 03rd Oct 2021
----- ehh, the one above???.....

SevenOme responds:--//"naomi: "SevenOP, Incredulous at your blasé attitude towards security." //

What, precisely, explicitly, and hopefully succinctly, in this thread, leads you to assert I have a "blasé attitude towards security." ? /////

naomi retorts : "Read your own posts."

LoL, is that 'doubling-down' ?

[Mozz71]

Although these people are imbeciles, I think 7OP isn't belittling terrorist activity or airport security, but rightfully deriding the OP for thinking that they may turn into Al Qaeda on us.

Utter scaremongering.

[naomi24]

SevenOP, //Which of your questions haven’t I answered?" @12:49 Sun 03rd Oct 2021
----- ehh, the one above???..... //

I answered your question. I said I'm incredulous at your blasé attitude towards security.

Mozz, we shouldn't assume we know the intent of law-breakers - or who they are or what they are likely to do. Complacency often results in disaster. Whatever their intent, they shouldn't be there.

[sevenOP]

naomi: "I answered your question. I said I'm incredulous at your blasé attitude towards security. "

And I asked you to justify that incredulity. Obfuscation par excellence from you, as per.

"Whatever their intent, they shouldn't be there."

Bourgeois paranoia strikes deep, as indeed it should.

[naomi24]

Bourgeois Paranoia? My oh my! That’s some bitter mentality you have there. What are you, SevenOP? Some old relic from Communist Russia? If it helps I don’t like you much either. Get over yourself you silly man.

[youngmafbog]

//but rightfully deriding the OP for thinking that they may turn into Al Qaeda on us.//

Terrorism comes in many forms and is certainly not unique to Al Qaeda.

Airport security has to be absolutely tops, anyone breaking into an airport should be treated as a potential terrorist (you dont know the intentions until you get them). If they fail to stop, then yes shoot.

Lets not forget it wouldn't be beyond the realms of possibility to dress up as these morons and break in if you were a terrorist.

[davebro]

what does "ontological" mean? (too bored to look it up)

[naomi24]

//anyone breaking into an airport has to be treated as a potential terrorist//

I couldn’t agree more, mfb.

[naomi24]

Dave, it means SevenOP is trying to look smart.

[sevenOP]

Ouch!! ... touched an 'aspirational' nerve there naomi ?

"On a bright morning, the apron of Farnborough — the expanse of concrete where planes manoeuvre and park at this small private airport 50km south-west of London — looks more like the personal museum of a billionaire hobbyist than a working airfield. The airport is full of immaculate private jets glinting in the low sun...
Driving along in an equally box-fresh Tesla — one of two the airport’s staff use to nip around the facility...
Concerned at public scrutiny, security conscious, mindful of the taxman...
It costs about £200,000 a year to rent hangar space for a jet at Farnborough...
O’Reilly is circumspect when asked about other billionaires who use the airport..."

That, is the bourgeois I meant. I did not *class* you among them, naomi..... are you ?

https://www.ft.com/content/a66ffaea-1f36-11e9-a46f-08f9738d6b2b